XDEB.L vs. MVEW.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

XDEB.L (Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C) and MVEW.L (iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility ESG UCITS ETF (Acc)) are both Global Equities funds tracking the MSCI ACWI NR USD, from DWS and iShares respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XDEB.L returned 6.36%/yr vs 6.63%/yr for MVEW.L. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. XDEB.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for MVEW.L.

Performance

XDEB.L vs. MVEW.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C (XDEB.L) and iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility ESG UCITS ETF (Acc) (MVEW.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

XDEB.L is traded in GBp, while MVEW.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the MVEW.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDEB.L achieves a 1.04% return, which is significantly higher than MVEW.L's 0.37% return.

XDEB.L

• 1D: 0.15%
• 1M: 1.82%
• YTD: 1.04%
• 6M: 0.90%
• 1Y: 2.65%
• 3Y*: 6.61%
• 5Y*: 6.36%
• 10Y*: 7.93%

MVEW.L

• 1D: 0.20%
• 1M: 1.97%
• YTD: 0.37%
• 6M: 0.14%
• 1Y: 3.27%
• 3Y*: 6.64%
• 5Y*: 6.63%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDEB.L vs. MVEW.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
XDEB.L Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C	1.04%	3.40%	13.01%	1.49%	1.23%	16.00%	-1.92%
MVEW.L iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility ESG UCITS ETF (Acc)	0.37%	3.73%	12.44%	4.00%	-0.60%	18.17%	-1.61%

Correlation

The correlation between XDEB.L and MVEW.L is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.94
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.95
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.96
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 20, 2020	0.96

The correlation between XDEB.L and MVEW.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

XDEB.L vs. MVEW.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XDEB.L	MVEW.L
Technology	20.1%	22.6%
Financial Services	14.0%	15.2%
Healthcare	13.8%	14.9%
Communication Services	12.1%	10.5%
Consumer Defensive	10.9%	10.2%
Industrials	9.2%	8.2%
Utilities	8.1%	6.7%
Consumer Cyclical	5.6%	5.4%
Energy	4.5%	3.3%
Basic Materials	1.1%	1.5%
Real Estate	0.7%	1.4%

Return for Risk

XDEB.L vs. MVEW.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDEB.L

XDEB.L Risk / Return Rank: 14
XDEB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 14
XDEB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 13
XDEB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 13
XDEB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 14
XDEB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 15

MVEW.L

MVEW.L Risk / Return Rank: 15
MVEW.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 16
MVEW.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 15
MVEW.L Omega Ratio Rank: 14
MVEW.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 16
MVEW.L Martin Ratio Rank: 16

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDEB.L vs. MVEW.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C (XDEB.L) and iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility ESG UCITS ETF (Acc) (MVEW.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XDEB.L	MVEW.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.33	0.41	-0.08
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.54	0.64	-0.10
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.06	1.07	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.41	0.56	-0.14
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.14	1.47	-0.33
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XDEB.L vs. MVEW.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDEB.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.33, which is comparable to the MVEW.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDEB.L and MVEW.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XDEB.L	MVEW.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.33	0.41	-0.08
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.66	0.68	-0.02
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.69	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.78	0.60	+0.18

Drawdowns

XDEB.L vs. MVEW.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDEB.L drawdown since its inception was -19.61%, which is greater than MVEW.L's maximum drawdown of -10.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDEB.L and MVEW.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	XDEB.L	MVEW.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.61%	-10.07%	-9.54%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.39%	-5.85%	-0.54%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-8.47%	-9.04%	+0.57%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-10.19%	-10.07%	-0.12%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-19.61%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.52%	-3.02%	-0.50%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.50%	-2.57%	-0.93%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.32%	2.22%	+0.10%

Volatility

XDEB.L vs. MVEW.L - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C (XDEB.L) and iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility ESG UCITS ETF (Acc) (MVEW.L) have volatilities of 2.66% and 2.63%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XDEB.L	MVEW.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.66%	2.63%	+0.03%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.97%	5.97%	0.00%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.97%	8.00%	-0.03%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.68%	9.78%	-0.10%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.52%	10.08%	+1.44%

XDEB.L vs. MVEW.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDEB.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than MVEW.L's 0.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

XDEB.L vs. MVEW.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither XDEB.L nor MVEW.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XDEB.L and MVEW.L in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.94, XDEB.L and MVEW.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, XDEB.L or MVEW.L?

On fees, XDEB.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XDEB.L or MVEW.L?

XDEB.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for MVEW.L.

What is the main difference between XDEB.L and MVEW.L?

Both ETFs track MSCI ACWI NR USD. They also come from different issuers: DWS and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XDEB.L and 0.30% for MVEW.L.