XDEB.L vs. ELLE.L
XDEB.L (Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C) and ELLE.L (Lyxor Index Fund - Lyxor Global Gender Equality (DR) Ucits ETF) are both Global Equities funds tracking the MSCI ACWI NR USD, from DWS and Amundi respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XDEB.L returned 6.36%/yr vs 7.31%/yr for ELLE.L. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XDEB.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for ELLE.L.
Performance
XDEB.L vs. ELLE.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
XDEB.L is traded in GBp, while ELLE.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ELLE.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XDEB.L achieves a 1.04% return, which is significantly lower than ELLE.L's 4.27% return.
XDEB.L
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- 1.82%
- YTD
- 1.04%
- 6M
- 0.90%
- 1Y
- 2.65%
- 3Y*
- 6.61%
- 5Y*
- 6.36%
- 10Y*
- 7.93%
ELLE.L
- 1D
- 0.64%
- 1M
- 1.98%
- YTD
- 4.27%
- 6M
- 5.69%
- 1Y
- 16.39%
- 3Y*
- 12.36%
- 5Y*
- 7.31%
- 10Y*
- —
XDEB.L vs. ELLE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XDEB.L Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C | 1.04% | 3.40% | 13.01% | 1.49% | 1.23% | 16.00% | -0.96% | 9.93% |
ELLE.L Lyxor Index Fund - Lyxor Global Gender Equality (DR) Ucits ETF | 4.27% | 12.41% | 11.30% | 10.91% | -6.46% | 17.68% | 9.87% | 5.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between XDEB.L and ELLE.L is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 23, 2019 | 0.20 |
Over the past year, XDEB.L and ELLE.L have become more correlated (0.49) than their long-term average of 0.20, meaning their price movements have been converging.
XDEB.L vs. ELLE.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XDEB.L
ELLE.L
Technology
Financial Services
Healthcare
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
-
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Technology
XDEB.L
ELLE.L
Financial Services
XDEB.L
ELLE.L
Healthcare
XDEB.L
ELLE.L
Communication Services
XDEB.L
ELLE.L
Consumer Defensive
XDEB.L
ELLE.L
Industrials
XDEB.L
ELLE.L
Utilities
XDEB.L
ELLE.L
Consumer Cyclical
XDEB.L
ELLE.L
Energy
XDEB.L
ELLE.L
-
Basic Materials
XDEB.L
ELLE.L
Real Estate
XDEB.L
ELLE.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XDEB.L vs. ELLE.L — Risk / Return Rank
XDEB.L
ELLE.L
XDEB.L vs. ELLE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C (XDEB.L) and Lyxor Index Fund - Lyxor Global Gender Equality (DR) Ucits ETF (ELLE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XDEB.L | ELLE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.53 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.26 | -0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.41 | 2.05 | -1.63 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.14 | 7.12 | -5.98 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XDEB.L | ELLE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33 | 1.48 | -1.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.66 | 0.90 | -0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.69 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.78 | 1.21 | -0.44 |
Drawdowns
XDEB.L vs. ELLE.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XDEB.L drawdown since its inception was -19.61%, roughly equal to the maximum ELLE.L drawdown of -20.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDEB.L and ELLE.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XDEB.L | ELLE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.61% | -20.30% | +0.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.39% | -7.98% | +1.59% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.47% | -14.31% | +5.84% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -10.19% | -14.31% | +4.12% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -19.61% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.52% | -2.07% | -1.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.50% | -3.25% | -0.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.32% | 2.30% | +0.02% |
Volatility
XDEB.L vs. ELLE.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C (XDEB.L) is 2.66%, while Lyxor Index Fund - Lyxor Global Gender Equality (DR) Ucits ETF (ELLE.L) has a volatility of 3.42%. This indicates that XDEB.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ELLE.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XDEB.L | ELLE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.66% | 3.42% | -0.76% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.97% | 8.91% | -2.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.97% | 11.00% | -3.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.68% | 19.28% | -9.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.52% | 23.83% | -12.31% |
XDEB.L vs. ELLE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XDEB.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than ELLE.L's 0.20% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XDEB.L vs. ELLE.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XDEB.L nor ELLE.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XDEB.L and ELLE.L have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ELLE.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ELLE.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XDEB.L.
Both ETFs track MSCI ACWI NR USD. They also come from different issuers: DWS and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XDEB.L and 0.20% for ELLE.L.
Find the right allocation for XDEB.L and ELLE.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer