PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XDEB.L vs. ELLE.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XDEB.L vs. ELLE.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C (XDEB.L) and Lyxor Index Fund - Lyxor Global Gender Equality (DR) Ucits ETF (ELLE.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XDEB.L is traded in GBp, while ELLE.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ELLE.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDEB.L achieves a 1.04% return, which is significantly lower than ELLE.L's 4.27% return.


XDEB.L

1D
0.15%
1M
1.82%
YTD
1.04%
6M
0.90%
1Y
2.65%
3Y*
6.61%
5Y*
6.36%
10Y*
7.93%

ELLE.L

1D
0.64%
1M
1.98%
YTD
4.27%
6M
5.69%
1Y
16.39%
3Y*
12.36%
5Y*
7.31%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDEB.L vs. ELLE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
XDEB.L
Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C
1.04%3.40%13.01%1.49%1.23%16.00%-0.96%9.93%
ELLE.L
Lyxor Index Fund - Lyxor Global Gender Equality (DR) Ucits ETF
4.27%12.41%11.30%10.91%-6.46%17.68%9.87%5.40%

Correlation

The correlation between XDEB.L and ELLE.L is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.29

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 23, 2019

0.20

Over the past year, XDEB.L and ELLE.L have become more correlated (0.49) than their long-term average of 0.20, meaning their price movements have been converging.

XDEB.L vs. ELLE.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XDEB.L
ELLE.L

Technology

20.1%
6.2%

Financial Services

14.0%
22.5%

Healthcare

13.8%
15.2%

Communication Services

12.1%
9.9%

Consumer Defensive

10.9%
10.5%

Industrials

9.2%
6.9%

Utilities

8.1%
7.0%

Consumer Cyclical

5.6%
12.0%

Energy

4.5%

-

Basic Materials

1.1%
4.7%

Real Estate

0.7%
5.2%

Technology

XDEB.L
20.1%
ELLE.L
6.2%

Financial Services

XDEB.L
14.0%
ELLE.L
22.5%

Healthcare

XDEB.L
13.8%
ELLE.L
15.2%

Communication Services

XDEB.L
12.1%
ELLE.L
9.9%

Consumer Defensive

XDEB.L
10.9%
ELLE.L
10.5%

Industrials

XDEB.L
9.2%
ELLE.L
6.9%

Utilities

XDEB.L
8.1%
ELLE.L
7.0%

Consumer Cyclical

XDEB.L
5.6%
ELLE.L
12.0%

Energy

XDEB.L
4.5%
ELLE.L

-

Basic Materials

XDEB.L
1.1%
ELLE.L
4.7%

Real Estate

XDEB.L
0.7%
ELLE.L
5.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XDEB.L vs. ELLE.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDEB.L
XDEB.L Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
XDEB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDEB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDEB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
XDEB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDEB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

ELLE.L
ELLE.L Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
ELLE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ELLE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
ELLE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
ELLE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
ELLE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDEB.L vs. ELLE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C (XDEB.L) and Lyxor Index Fund - Lyxor Global Gender Equality (DR) Ucits ETF (ELLE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XDEB.LELLE.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.26

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.41

2.05

-1.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.14

7.12

-5.98

XDEB.L vs. ELLE.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDEB.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.33, which is lower than the ELLE.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDEB.L and ELLE.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XDEB.LELLE.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

1.48

-1.15

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

0.90

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.78

1.21

-0.44

Drawdowns

XDEB.L vs. ELLE.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDEB.L drawdown since its inception was -19.61%, roughly equal to the maximum ELLE.L drawdown of -20.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDEB.L and ELLE.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XDEB.LELLE.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.61%

-20.30%

+0.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.39%

-7.98%

+1.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.47%

-14.31%

+5.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.19%

-14.31%

+4.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.52%

-2.07%

-1.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.50%

-3.25%

-0.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.32%

2.30%

+0.02%

Volatility

XDEB.L vs. ELLE.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C (XDEB.L) is 2.66%, while Lyxor Index Fund - Lyxor Global Gender Equality (DR) Ucits ETF (ELLE.L) has a volatility of 3.42%. This indicates that XDEB.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ELLE.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XDEB.LELLE.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.66%

3.42%

-0.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.97%

8.91%

-2.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.97%

11.00%

-3.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.68%

19.28%

-9.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.52%

23.83%

-12.31%

XDEB.L vs. ELLE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDEB.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than ELLE.L's 0.20% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XDEB.L vs. ELLE.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither XDEB.L nor ELLE.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


XDEB.L and ELLE.L have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ELLE.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ELLE.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XDEB.L.

Both ETFs track MSCI ACWI NR USD. They also come from different issuers: DWS and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XDEB.L and 0.20% for ELLE.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XDEB.L and ELLE.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer