XDDX.DE vs. PR1Z.DE

Last updated Jul 18, 2026

XDDX.DE (Xtrackers DAX ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1D) and PR1Z.DE (Amundi Prime Eurozone UCITS ETF DR (D)) are both Europe Equities funds - XDDX.DE tracks the FSE DAX TR EUR while PR1Z.DE tracks the Solactive GBS Developed Markets Eurozone Large & Mid Cap. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XDDX.DE returned 8.66%/yr vs 11.34%/yr for PR1Z.DE. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XDDX.DE charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for PR1Z.DE.

Performance

XDDX.DE vs. PR1Z.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers DAX ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1D (XDDX.DE) and Amundi Prime Eurozone UCITS ETF DR (D) (PR1Z.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDDX.DE achieves a 3.88% return, which is significantly lower than PR1Z.DE's 10.76% return.

XDDX.DE

• 1D: -0.44%
• 1M: -0.25%
• 6M: 2.82%
• YTD: 3.88%
• 1Y: 6.10%
• 3Y*: 14.27%
• 5Y*: 8.66%
• 10Y*: 8.72%

PR1Z.DE

• 1D: -0.90%
• 1M: -1.74%
• 6M: 6.62%
• YTD: 10.76%
• 1Y: 20.54%
• 3Y*: 16.17%
• 5Y*: 11.34%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDDX.DE vs. PR1Z.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
XDDX.DE Xtrackers DAX ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1D	3.88%	19.14%	16.17%	19.56%	-13.67%	15.21%	3.12%	17.56%
PR1Z.DE Amundi Prime Eurozone UCITS ETF DR (D)	10.76%	24.78%	9.45%	19.41%	-12.44%	27.38%	-4.63%	22.47%

Correlation

The correlation between XDDX.DE and PR1Z.DE is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.86
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.91
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.92
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2019	0.93

The correlation between XDDX.DE and PR1Z.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

XDDX.DE vs. PR1Z.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDDX.DE

XDDX.DE Risk / Return Rank: 17
XDDX.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 17
XDDX.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
XDDX.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 16
XDDX.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
XDDX.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 19

PR1Z.DE

PR1Z.DE Risk / Return Rank: 53
PR1Z.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
PR1Z.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
PR1Z.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 53
PR1Z.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
PR1Z.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 56

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDDX.DE vs. PR1Z.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers DAX ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1D (XDDX.DE) and Amundi Prime Eurozone UCITS ETF DR (D) (PR1Z.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XDDX.DE	PR1Z.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.38	1.39	-1.00
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.65	2.08	-1.43
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.08	1.26	-0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.51	1.98	-1.48
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.44	7.42	-5.98

XDDX.DE vs. PR1Z.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDDX.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.38, which is lower than the PR1Z.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDDX.DE and PR1Z.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

XDDX.DE vs. PR1Z.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDDX.DE drawdown since its inception was -38.74%, roughly equal to the maximum PR1Z.DE drawdown of -39.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDDX.DE and PR1Z.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	XDDX.DE	PR1Z.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.74%	-39.55%	+0.81%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.96%	-10.31%	-1.65%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.62%	-15.67%	-0.95%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.03%	-24.21%	-2.82%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-38.74%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.10%	-3.14%	+1.04%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.09%	-5.54%	-1.55%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.23%	2.76%	+1.47%

Volatility

XDDX.DE vs. PR1Z.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers DAX ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1D (XDDX.DE) is 3.88%, while Amundi Prime Eurozone UCITS ETF DR (D) (PR1Z.DE) has a volatility of 4.10%. This indicates that XDDX.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PR1Z.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XDDX.DE	PR1Z.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.88%	4.10%	-0.22%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.78%	12.54%	+0.24%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.84%	14.77%	+1.07%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.14%	16.31%	+0.83%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.07%	18.65%	-0.58%

XDDX.DE vs. PR1Z.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDDX.DE has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than PR1Z.DE's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

XDDX.DE vs. PR1Z.DE - Dividend Comparison

XDDX.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.31%, more than PR1Z.DE's 2.28% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PR1Z.DE Amundi Prime Eurozone UCITS ETF DR (D)	2.28%	2.53%	2.77%	2.80%	3.09%	1.83%	2.11%	2.60%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
XDDX.DE Xtrackers DAX ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1D	2.31%	2.40%	2.68%	3.34%	5.35%	2.05%	3.14%	2.81%	2.34%	2.16%	1.40%	1.06%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XDDX.DE and PR1Z.DE in my portfolio?

XDDX.DE and PR1Z.DE have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, XDDX.DE or PR1Z.DE?

On fees, PR1Z.DE is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XDDX.DE or PR1Z.DE?

PR1Z.DE is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for XDDX.DE.

What is the main difference between XDDX.DE and PR1Z.DE?

XDDX.DE tracks FSE DAX TR EUR, while PR1Z.DE tracks Solactive GBS Developed Markets Eurozone Large & Mid Cap. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for XDDX.DE and 0.05% for PR1Z.DE.