XDDX.DE vs. IBCJ.DE
XDDX.DE (Xtrackers DAX ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1D) and IBCJ.DE (iShares MSCI Poland UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both Europe Equities funds - XDDX.DE tracks the FSE DAX TR EUR while IBCJ.DE tracks the MSCI Poland. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XDDX.DE returned 8.72%/yr vs 9.24%/yr for IBCJ.DE. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XDDX.DE charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.74%/yr for IBCJ.DE.
Performance
XDDX.DE vs. IBCJ.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XDDX.DE achieves a 3.88% return, which is significantly lower than IBCJ.DE's 17.97% return. Over the past 10 years, XDDX.DE has underperformed IBCJ.DE with an annualized return of 8.72%, while IBCJ.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 9.24% annualized return.
XDDX.DE
- 1D
- -0.44%
- 1M
- -0.25%
- 6M
- 2.82%
- YTD
- 3.88%
- 1Y
- 6.10%
- 3Y*
- 14.27%
- 5Y*
- 8.66%
- 10Y*
- 8.72%
IBCJ.DE
- 1D
- -1.13%
- 1M
- -1.57%
- 6M
- 13.29%
- YTD
- 17.97%
- 1Y
- 32.76%
- 3Y*
- 27.38%
- 5Y*
- 15.53%
- 10Y*
- 9.24%
XDDX.DE vs. IBCJ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XDDX.DE Xtrackers DAX ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1D | 3.88% | 19.14% | 16.17% | 19.56% | -13.67% | 15.21% | 3.12% | 24.70% | -18.53% | 12.16% |
IBCJ.DE iShares MSCI Poland UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 17.97% | 53.72% | -0.44% | 43.89% | -21.77% | 14.38% | -18.70% | -3.73% | -9.08% | 35.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between XDDX.DE and IBCJ.DE is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 28, 2012 | 0.55 |
The correlation between XDDX.DE and IBCJ.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.57 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XDDX.DE vs. IBCJ.DE — Risk / Return Rank
XDDX.DE
IBCJ.DE
XDDX.DE vs. IBCJ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers DAX ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1D (XDDX.DE) and iShares MSCI Poland UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IBCJ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XDDX.DE | IBCJ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.24 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.51 | 3.27 | -2.76 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.44 | 7.84 | -6.40 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XDDX.DE vs. IBCJ.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XDDX.DE drawdown since its inception was -38.74%, smaller than the maximum IBCJ.DE drawdown of -67.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDDX.DE and IBCJ.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XDDX.DE | IBCJ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.74% | -67.13% | +28.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.96% | -9.98% | -1.98% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.62% | -18.52% | +1.90% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.03% | -47.29% | +20.26% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.74% | -56.09% | +17.35% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.10% | -1.66% | -0.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.09% | -39.16% | +32.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.23% | 4.16% | +0.07% |
Volatility
XDDX.DE vs. IBCJ.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers DAX ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1D (XDDX.DE) is 3.88%, while iShares MSCI Poland UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IBCJ.DE) has a volatility of 4.31%. This indicates that XDDX.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBCJ.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XDDX.DE | IBCJ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.88% | 4.31% | -0.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.78% | 17.59% | -4.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.84% | 23.03% | -7.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.14% | 26.71% | -9.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.07% | 24.92% | -6.85% |
XDDX.DE vs. IBCJ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XDDX.DE has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than IBCJ.DE's 0.74% expense ratio.
Dividends
XDDX.DE vs. IBCJ.DE - Dividend Comparison
XDDX.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.31%, while IBCJ.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBCJ.DE iShares MSCI Poland UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XDDX.DE Xtrackers DAX ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1D | 2.31% | 2.40% | 2.68% | 3.34% | 5.35% | 2.05% | 3.14% | 2.81% | 2.34% | 2.16% | 1.40% | 1.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XDDX.DE and IBCJ.DE have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XDDX.DE is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XDDX.DE is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for IBCJ.DE.
XDDX.DE tracks FSE DAX TR EUR, while IBCJ.DE tracks MSCI Poland. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for XDDX.DE and 0.74% for IBCJ.DE.
Find the right allocation for XDDX.DE and IBCJ.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer