PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XDCC.DE vs. XDGU.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XDCC.DE vs. XDGU.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (XDCC.DE) and Xtrackers USD Corporate Bonds UCITS ETF 1D (XDGU.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XDCC.DE is traded in USD, while XDGU.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the XDGU.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDCC.DE achieves a 0.36% return, which is significantly higher than XDGU.DE's -0.18% return.


XDCC.DE

1D
0.14%
1M
0.05%
YTD
0.36%
6M
0.63%
1Y
5.81%
3Y*
5.17%
5Y*
0.11%
10Y*

XDGU.DE

1D
0.01%
1M
0.31%
YTD
-0.18%
6M
0.02%
1Y
4.79%
3Y*
4.58%
5Y*
-0.35%
10Y*
2.18%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDCC.DE vs. XDGU.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
XDCC.DE
Xtrackers USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF
0.36%8.20%1.13%9.22%-17.61%20.86%-1.01%
XDGU.DE
Xtrackers USD Corporate Bonds UCITS ETF 1D
-0.19%8.30%0.28%8.43%-17.62%-2.51%2.92%

Correlation

The correlation between XDCC.DE and XDGU.DE is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2020

0.83

The correlation between XDCC.DE and XDGU.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.75 (1 year) to 0.85 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XDCC.DE vs. XDGU.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDCC.DE
XDCC.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
XDCC.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDCC.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDCC.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
XDCC.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDCC.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

XDGU.DE
XDGU.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
XDGU.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDGU.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDGU.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
XDGU.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDGU.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDCC.DE vs. XDGU.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (XDCC.DE) and Xtrackers USD Corporate Bonds UCITS ETF 1D (XDGU.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XDCC.DEXDGU.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.13

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.68

1.33

+0.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.84

3.76

+1.08

XDCC.DE vs. XDGU.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDCC.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.02, which is higher than the XDGU.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDCC.DE and XDGU.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XDCC.DEXDGU.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.02

0.76

+0.26

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.01

-0.04

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.24

0.28

-0.04

Drawdowns

XDCC.DE vs. XDGU.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDCC.DE drawdown since its inception was -25.01%, roughly equal to the maximum XDGU.DE drawdown of -25.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDCC.DE and XDGU.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XDCC.DEXDGU.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.01%

-25.43%

+0.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.36%

-3.59%

+0.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.83%

-7.97%

+0.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.01%

-25.17%

+0.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.99%

-5.61%

+2.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.38%

-7.01%

-2.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.16%

1.27%

-0.11%

Volatility

XDCC.DE vs. XDGU.DE - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (XDCC.DE) has a higher volatility of 2.05% compared to Xtrackers USD Corporate Bonds UCITS ETF 1D (XDGU.DE) at 1.84%. This indicates that XDCC.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDGU.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XDCC.DEXDGU.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.05%

1.84%

+0.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.17%

4.34%

-0.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.56%

6.29%

-0.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.32%

9.08%

-0.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.21%

9.70%

+2.51%

XDCC.DE vs. XDGU.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both XDCC.DE and XDGU.DE have an expense ratio of 0.12%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XDCC.DE vs. XDGU.DE - Dividend Comparison

XDCC.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XDGU.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.07%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
XDCC.DE
Xtrackers USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XDGU.DE
Xtrackers USD Corporate Bonds UCITS ETF 1D
4.07%4.30%5.04%3.85%3.89%4.75%3.58%2.64%2.25%3.30%0.23%

Frequently Asked Questions


XDCC.DE and XDGU.DE have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.12% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XDCC.DE and XDGU.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.12% per year.

XDCC.DE tracks Bloomberg USD Liquid Investment Grade Corporate, while XDGU.DE tracks Bloomberg US Corp Bond TR USD.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XDCC.DE and XDGU.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer