PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XDCC.DE vs. IS3F.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XDCC.DE vs. IS3F.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (XDCC.DE) and iShares $ Corp Bond Interest Rate Hedged UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IS3F.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XDCC.DE is traded in USD, while IS3F.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the IS3F.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDCC.DE achieves a -0.53% return, which is significantly lower than IS3F.DE's 2.24% return.


XDCC.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
-1.17%
6M
-0.64%
YTD
-0.53%
1Y
4.03%
3Y*
4.50%
5Y*
-0.55%
10Y*

IS3F.DE

1D
-0.27%
1M
0.57%
6M
1.74%
YTD
2.24%
1Y
4.36%
3Y*
7.35%
5Y*
5.36%
10Y*
4.39%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDCC.DE vs. IS3F.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
XDCC.DE
Xtrackers USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF
-0.53%8.20%1.13%9.22%-17.61%20.87%-1.14%
IS3F.DE
iShares $ Corp Bond Interest Rate Hedged UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
2.24%5.81%7.75%10.74%0.64%1.17%4.62%

Correlation

The correlation between XDCC.DE and IS3F.DE is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.03

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2020

0.11

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XDCC.DE vs. IS3F.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDCC.DE
XDCC.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
XDCC.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDCC.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDCC.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
XDCC.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDCC.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

IS3F.DE
IS3F.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
IS3F.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IS3F.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
IS3F.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
IS3F.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
IS3F.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDCC.DE vs. IS3F.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (XDCC.DE) and iShares $ Corp Bond Interest Rate Hedged UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IS3F.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XDCC.DEIS3F.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.15

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.20

2.35

-1.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.24

7.28

-4.04

XDCC.DE vs. IS3F.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDCC.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.73, which is comparable to the IS3F.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDCC.DE and IS3F.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XDCC.DE vs. IS3F.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDCC.DE drawdown since its inception was -25.01%, smaller than the maximum IS3F.DE drawdown of -31.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDCC.DE and IS3F.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XDCC.DEIS3F.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.01%

-31.53%

+6.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.36%

-1.85%

-1.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.83%

-4.39%

-3.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.01%

-6.33%

-18.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.85%

-0.81%

-3.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.25%

-14.59%

+5.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.25%

0.60%

+0.65%

Volatility

XDCC.DE vs. IS3F.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (XDCC.DE) is 1.32%, while iShares $ Corp Bond Interest Rate Hedged UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IS3F.DE) has a volatility of 1.43%. This indicates that XDCC.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IS3F.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XDCC.DEIS3F.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.32%

1.43%

-0.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.17%

3.67%

+0.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.54%

4.92%

+0.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.37%

5.71%

+2.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.14%

7.07%

+5.07%

XDCC.DE vs. IS3F.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDCC.DE has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than IS3F.DE's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XDCC.DE vs. IS3F.DE - Dividend Comparison

XDCC.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IS3F.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.27%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IS3F.DE
iShares $ Corp Bond Interest Rate Hedged UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
4.27%4.77%5.36%4.95%2.10%1.50%2.62%3.52%2.81%2.25%2.36%3.21%
XDCC.DE
Xtrackers USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XDCC.DE and IS3F.DE have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XDCC.DE is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XDCC.DE is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for IS3F.DE.

XDCC.DE tracks Bloomberg USD Liquid Investment Grade Corporate, while IS3F.DE tracks Markit iBoxx USD Liquid Investment Grade Interest Rate Hedged Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for XDCC.DE and 0.25% for IS3F.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XDCC.DE and IS3F.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer