XDCC.DE vs. 5UOA.DE
XDCC.DE (Xtrackers USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF) and 5UOA.DE (iShares USD Corporate Bond ESG UCITS ETF Acc) are both Corporate Bonds funds - XDCC.DE tracks the Bloomberg USD Liquid Investment Grade Corporate while 5UOA.DE tracks the Bloomberg MSCI US Corporate Sustainable SRI. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XDCC.DE returned 0.11%/yr vs 0.43%/yr for 5UOA.DE. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XDCC.DE charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for 5UOA.DE.
Performance
XDCC.DE vs. 5UOA.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
XDCC.DE is traded in USD, while 5UOA.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the 5UOA.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XDCC.DE achieves a 0.36% return, which is significantly higher than 5UOA.DE's -0.16% return.
XDCC.DE
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- 0.05%
- YTD
- 0.36%
- 6M
- 0.63%
- 1Y
- 5.81%
- 3Y*
- 5.17%
- 5Y*
- 0.11%
- 10Y*
- —
5UOA.DE
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- -0.17%
- YTD
- -0.16%
- 6M
- 0.38%
- 1Y
- 4.99%
- 3Y*
- 4.97%
- 5Y*
- 0.43%
- 10Y*
- —
XDCC.DE vs. 5UOA.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XDCC.DE Xtrackers USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF | 0.36% | 8.20% | 1.13% | 9.22% | -17.61% | 20.86% | -1.01% |
5UOA.DE iShares USD Corporate Bond ESG UCITS ETF Acc | -0.16% | 8.37% | 1.76% | 7.78% | -14.67% | -1.95% | 2.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between XDCC.DE and 5UOA.DE is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2020 | 0.78 |
The correlation between XDCC.DE and 5UOA.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.68 (1 year) to 0.80 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XDCC.DE vs. 5UOA.DE — Risk / Return Rank
XDCC.DE
5UOA.DE
XDCC.DE vs. 5UOA.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (XDCC.DE) and iShares USD Corporate Bond ESG UCITS ETF Acc (5UOA.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XDCC.DE | 5UOA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.16 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.68 | 1.72 | -0.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.84 | 5.27 | -0.43 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XDCC.DE | 5UOA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.02 | 0.92 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.01 | 0.06 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.24 | 0.27 | -0.03 |
Drawdowns
XDCC.DE vs. 5UOA.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XDCC.DE drawdown since its inception was -25.01%, which is greater than 5UOA.DE's maximum drawdown of -21.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDCC.DE and 5UOA.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XDCC.DE | 5UOA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.01% | -21.38% | -3.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.36% | -2.86% | -0.50% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.83% | -5.93% | -1.90% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.01% | -21.26% | -3.75% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.99% | -1.12% | -1.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.38% | -7.29% | -2.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.16% | 0.93% | +0.23% |
Volatility
XDCC.DE vs. 5UOA.DE - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (XDCC.DE) has a higher volatility of 2.05% compared to iShares USD Corporate Bond ESG UCITS ETF Acc (5UOA.DE) at 1.59%. This indicates that XDCC.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 5UOA.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XDCC.DE | 5UOA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.05% | 1.59% | +0.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.17% | 3.64% | +0.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.56% | 5.36% | +0.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.32% | 7.61% | +0.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.21% | 7.57% | +4.64% |
XDCC.DE vs. 5UOA.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XDCC.DE has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than 5UOA.DE's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XDCC.DE vs. 5UOA.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither XDCC.DE nor 5UOA.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XDCC.DE and 5UOA.DE have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XDCC.DE is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XDCC.DE is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for 5UOA.DE.
XDCC.DE tracks Bloomberg USD Liquid Investment Grade Corporate, while 5UOA.DE tracks Bloomberg MSCI US Corporate Sustainable SRI. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for XDCC.DE and 0.15% for 5UOA.DE.
Find the right allocation for XDCC.DE and 5UOA.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer