PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XDAX.L vs. CEUR.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XDAX.L vs. CEUR.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers DAX UCITS ETF 1C (XDAX.L) and Amundi MSCI Europe (CEUR.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDAX.L achieves a 0.31% return, which is significantly lower than CEUR.L's 6.66% return.


XDAX.L

1D
0.66%
1M
2.21%
YTD
0.31%
6M
2.98%
1Y
5.08%
3Y*
15.60%
5Y*
9.31%
10Y*

CEUR.L

1D
0.46%
1M
3.94%
YTD
6.66%
6M
8.98%
1Y
19.26%
3Y*
13.68%
5Y*
9.47%
10Y*
9.88%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDAX.L vs. CEUR.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XDAX.L
Xtrackers DAX UCITS ETF 1C
0.31%28.81%13.14%17.20%-7.58%7.86%9.38%16.48%-17.14%3.27%
CEUR.L
Amundi MSCI Europe
6.66%24.46%4.90%12.93%-5.96%17.02%2.29%19.59%-9.49%2.93%

Correlation

The correlation between XDAX.L and CEUR.L is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2017

0.90

The correlation between XDAX.L and CEUR.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

XDAX.L vs. CEUR.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XDAX.L
CEUR.L

Industrials

34.8%
19.8%

Financial Services

21.0%
25.1%

Technology

13.2%
10.4%

Consumer Cyclical

7.0%
6.2%

Communication Services

6.1%
3.4%

Healthcare

5.7%
13.8%

Basic Materials

5.3%
3.8%

Utilities

5.0%
5.3%

Real Estate

1.0%
1.7%

Consumer Defensive

0.9%
7.2%

Energy

-

3.5%

Industrials

XDAX.L
34.8%
CEUR.L
19.8%

Financial Services

XDAX.L
21.0%
CEUR.L
25.1%

Technology

XDAX.L
13.2%
CEUR.L
10.4%

Consumer Cyclical

XDAX.L
7.0%
CEUR.L
6.2%

Communication Services

XDAX.L
6.1%
CEUR.L
3.4%

Healthcare

XDAX.L
5.7%
CEUR.L
13.8%

Basic Materials

XDAX.L
5.3%
CEUR.L
3.8%

Utilities

XDAX.L
5.0%
CEUR.L
5.3%

Real Estate

XDAX.L
1.0%
CEUR.L
1.7%

Consumer Defensive

XDAX.L
0.9%
CEUR.L
7.2%

Energy

XDAX.L

-

CEUR.L
3.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XDAX.L vs. CEUR.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDAX.L
XDAX.L Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
XDAX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDAX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDAX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
XDAX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDAX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

CEUR.L
CEUR.L Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
CEUR.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CEUR.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
CEUR.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
CEUR.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
CEUR.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDAX.L vs. CEUR.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers DAX UCITS ETF 1C (XDAX.L) and Amundi MSCI Europe (CEUR.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XDAX.LCEUR.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.29

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.39

1.74

-1.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.27

6.06

-4.79

XDAX.L vs. CEUR.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDAX.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.33, which is lower than the CEUR.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDAX.L and CEUR.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XDAX.LCEUR.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

1.54

-1.21

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

0.68

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

0.56

-0.16

Drawdowns

XDAX.L vs. CEUR.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDAX.L drawdown since its inception was -37.09%, which is greater than CEUR.L's maximum drawdown of -28.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDAX.L and CEUR.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XDAX.LCEUR.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.09%

-28.63%

-8.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.83%

-11.05%

-1.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.98%

-12.66%

-1.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.44%

-17.85%

-5.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.19%

-1.52%

-1.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.71%

-4.58%

-2.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.01%

3.17%

+0.84%

Volatility

XDAX.L vs. CEUR.L - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers DAX UCITS ETF 1C (XDAX.L) has a higher volatility of 4.71% compared to Amundi MSCI Europe (CEUR.L) at 4.25%. This indicates that XDAX.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CEUR.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XDAX.LCEUR.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.71%

4.25%

+0.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.39%

10.53%

+1.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.15%

12.44%

+2.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.93%

13.88%

+3.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.76%

14.97%

+3.79%

XDAX.L vs. CEUR.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDAX.L has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than CEUR.L's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XDAX.L vs. CEUR.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither XDAX.L nor CEUR.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


XDAX.L and CEUR.L have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CEUR.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CEUR.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for XDAX.L.

XDAX.L tracks FSE DAX TR EUR, while CEUR.L tracks MSCI Europe NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for XDAX.L and 0.05% for CEUR.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XDAX.L and CEUR.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer