PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XDAX.L vs. AUM5.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XDAX.L vs. AUM5.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers DAX UCITS ETF 1C (XDAX.L) and Amundi S&P 500 UCITS ETF EUR (AUM5.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XDAX.L is traded in GBp, while AUM5.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the AUM5.DE values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDAX.L achieves a 0.31% return, which is significantly lower than AUM5.DE's 10.51% return.


XDAX.L

1D
0.66%
1M
2.21%
YTD
0.31%
6M
2.98%
1Y
5.08%
3Y*
15.60%
5Y*
9.31%
10Y*

AUM5.DE

1D
-0.04%
1M
5.44%
YTD
10.51%
6M
10.34%
1Y
29.06%
3Y*
19.12%
5Y*
15.04%
10Y*
16.23%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDAX.L vs. AUM5.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XDAX.L
Xtrackers DAX UCITS ETF 1C
0.31%28.81%13.14%17.20%-7.58%7.86%9.38%16.48%-17.14%3.27%
AUM5.DE
Amundi S&P 500 UCITS ETF EUR
10.51%10.25%26.62%20.19%-9.44%31.02%13.15%27.92%0.39%8.75%

Correlation

The correlation between XDAX.L and AUM5.DE is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.48

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2017

0.62

The correlation between XDAX.L and AUM5.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.48 (3 years) to 0.62 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XDAX.L vs. AUM5.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDAX.L
XDAX.L Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
XDAX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDAX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDAX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
XDAX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDAX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

AUM5.DE
AUM5.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
AUM5.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AUM5.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
AUM5.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
AUM5.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
AUM5.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDAX.L vs. AUM5.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers DAX UCITS ETF 1C (XDAX.L) and Amundi S&P 500 UCITS ETF EUR (AUM5.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XDAX.LAUM5.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.95

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.48

-0.41

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.39

4.07

-3.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.27

14.68

-13.41

XDAX.L vs. AUM5.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDAX.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.33, which is lower than the AUM5.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDAX.L and AUM5.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XDAX.LAUM5.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

2.60

-2.26

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

1.01

-0.46

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

1.00

-0.61

Drawdowns

XDAX.L vs. AUM5.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDAX.L drawdown since its inception was -37.09%, which is greater than AUM5.DE's maximum drawdown of -26.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDAX.L and AUM5.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XDAX.LAUM5.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.09%

-26.24%

-10.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.83%

-7.10%

-5.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.98%

-22.05%

+8.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.44%

-22.05%

-1.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.19%

-0.26%

-2.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.71%

-3.26%

-3.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.01%

1.97%

+2.04%

Volatility

XDAX.L vs. AUM5.DE - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers DAX UCITS ETF 1C (XDAX.L) has a higher volatility of 4.71% compared to Amundi S&P 500 UCITS ETF EUR (AUM5.DE) at 3.01%. This indicates that XDAX.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AUM5.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XDAX.LAUM5.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.71%

3.01%

+1.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.39%

7.46%

+4.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.15%

11.15%

+4.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.93%

14.74%

+2.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.76%

15.95%

+2.81%

XDAX.L vs. AUM5.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDAX.L has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than AUM5.DE's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XDAX.L vs. AUM5.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither XDAX.L nor AUM5.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


XDAX.L and AUM5.DE have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XDAX.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XDAX.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for AUM5.DE.

XDAX.L is categorized as Europe Equities, while AUM5.DE is S&P 500. XDAX.L tracks FSE DAX TR EUR, while AUM5.DE tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for XDAX.L and 0.15% for AUM5.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XDAX.L and AUM5.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer