PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XD9U.DE vs. EDMU.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XD9U.DE vs. EDMU.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI USA UCITS ETF 1C (XD9U.DE) and iShares MSCI USA ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD Acc (EDMU.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XD9U.DE achieves a 11.32% return, which is significantly higher than EDMU.DE's 10.40% return.


XD9U.DE

1D
-0.07%
1M
4.48%
YTD
11.32%
6M
10.63%
1Y
25.16%
3Y*
19.02%
5Y*
14.38%
10Y*
14.92%

EDMU.DE

1D
-0.09%
1M
4.59%
YTD
10.40%
6M
9.74%
1Y
23.04%
3Y*
17.44%
5Y*
12.84%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XD9U.DE vs. EDMU.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
XD9U.DE
Xtrackers MSCI USA UCITS ETF 1C
11.32%4.60%32.32%23.38%-15.69%38.71%9.43%13.42%
EDMU.DE
iShares MSCI USA ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD Acc
10.40%2.64%31.12%22.05%-17.35%38.97%10.90%13.90%

Correlation

The correlation between XD9U.DE and EDMU.DE is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 23, 2019

0.99

The correlation between XD9U.DE and EDMU.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XD9U.DE vs. EDMU.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XD9U.DE
XD9U.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
XD9U.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XD9U.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
XD9U.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
XD9U.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
XD9U.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

EDMU.DE
EDMU.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
EDMU.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EDMU.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
EDMU.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
EDMU.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
EDMU.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XD9U.DE vs. EDMU.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI USA UCITS ETF 1C (XD9U.DE) and iShares MSCI USA ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD Acc (EDMU.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XD9U.DEEDMU.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.36

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.43

2.85

+0.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.92

9.88

+2.04

XD9U.DE vs. EDMU.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XD9U.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.15, which is comparable to the EDMU.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XD9U.DE and EDMU.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XD9U.DEEDMU.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.15

1.95

+0.20

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

0.82

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.90

0.83

+0.07

Drawdowns

XD9U.DE vs. EDMU.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XD9U.DE drawdown since its inception was -34.11%, roughly equal to the maximum EDMU.DE drawdown of -33.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XD9U.DE and EDMU.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XD9U.DEEDMU.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.11%

-33.43%

-0.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.30%

-8.15%

+0.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.68%

-24.12%

+0.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.68%

-24.12%

+0.44%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.38%

-0.41%

+0.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.37%

-5.36%

+0.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.11%

2.36%

-0.25%

Volatility

XD9U.DE vs. EDMU.DE - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI USA UCITS ETF 1C (XD9U.DE) and iShares MSCI USA ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD Acc (EDMU.DE) have volatilities of 2.71% and 2.69%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XD9U.DEEDMU.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.71%

2.69%

+0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.64%

7.80%

-0.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.68%

11.93%

-0.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.42%

15.55%

-0.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.23%

17.39%

-1.16%

XD9U.DE vs. EDMU.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both XD9U.DE and EDMU.DE have an expense ratio of 0.07%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XD9U.DE vs. EDMU.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither XD9U.DE nor EDMU.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, XD9U.DE and EDMU.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Both ETFs have the same 0.07% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XD9U.DE and EDMU.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.07% per year.

XD9U.DE tracks MSCI USA, while EDMU.DE tracks MSCI USA ESG Enhanced Focus. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XD9U.DE and EDMU.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer