XCTW.DE vs. XZW0.DE

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

XCTW.DE (Xtrackers MSCI World Climate Transition UCITS ETF) and XZW0.DE (Xtrackers MSCI World ESG UCITS ETF 1C) are both Global Equities funds - XCTW.DE tracks the MSCI ACWI NR USD while XZW0.DE tracks the MSCI World Low Carbon SRI Leaders. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, XCTW.DE returned 16.67%/yr vs 16.56%/yr for XZW0.DE. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. XCTW.DE charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for XZW0.DE.

Performance

XCTW.DE vs. XZW0.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI World Climate Transition UCITS ETF (XCTW.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World ESG UCITS ETF 1C (XZW0.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XCTW.DE achieves a 9.85% return, which is significantly higher than XZW0.DE's 7.60% return.

XCTW.DE

• 1D: 0.05%
• 1M: 4.92%
• YTD: 9.85%
• 6M: 10.34%
• 1Y: 22.78%
• 3Y*: 16.67%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

XZW0.DE

• 1D: 0.53%
• 1M: 4.77%
• YTD: 7.60%
• 6M: 8.79%
• 1Y: 20.15%
• 3Y*: 16.56%
• 5Y*: 12.44%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XCTW.DE vs. XZW0.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
XCTW.DE Xtrackers MSCI World Climate Transition UCITS ETF	9.85%	7.28%	25.26%	12.68%
XZW0.DE Xtrackers MSCI World ESG UCITS ETF 1C	7.60%	6.65%	27.16%	15.65%

Correlation

The correlation between XCTW.DE and XZW0.DE is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.95
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.96
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 10, 2023	0.96

The correlation between XCTW.DE and XZW0.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

XCTW.DE vs. XZW0.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XCTW.DE

XCTW.DE Risk / Return Rank: 61
XCTW.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
XCTW.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
XCTW.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 61
XCTW.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
XCTW.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 66

XZW0.DE

XZW0.DE Risk / Return Rank: 46
XZW0.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
XZW0.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
XZW0.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 48
XZW0.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
XZW0.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 45

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XCTW.DE vs. XZW0.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Climate Transition UCITS ETF (XCTW.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World ESG UCITS ETF 1C (XZW0.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XCTW.DE	XZW0.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.96	1.63	+0.33
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.80	2.30	+0.50
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.30	+0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.94	1.95	+0.99
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.85	7.27	+4.58
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XCTW.DE vs. XZW0.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XCTW.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.96, which is comparable to the XZW0.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XCTW.DE and XZW0.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XCTW.DE	XZW0.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.96	1.63	+0.33
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.83	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.29	0.80	+0.49

Drawdowns

XCTW.DE vs. XZW0.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XCTW.DE drawdown since its inception was -21.64%, smaller than the maximum XZW0.DE drawdown of -33.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XCTW.DE and XZW0.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	XCTW.DE	XZW0.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.64%	-33.22%	+11.58%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.72%	-10.30%	+2.58%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.64%	-22.36%	+0.72%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-22.36%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.31%	-0.58%	+0.27%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.65%	-5.11%	+2.46%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.92%	2.76%	-0.84%

Volatility

XCTW.DE vs. XZW0.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI World Climate Transition UCITS ETF (XCTW.DE) is 2.68%, while Xtrackers MSCI World ESG UCITS ETF 1C (XZW0.DE) has a volatility of 3.11%. This indicates that XCTW.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XZW0.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XCTW.DE	XZW0.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.68%	3.11%	-0.43%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.12%	8.87%	-0.75%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.55%	12.32%	-0.77%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.16%	14.88%	-1.72%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.16%	16.38%	-3.22%

XCTW.DE vs. XZW0.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XCTW.DE has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than XZW0.DE's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

XCTW.DE vs. XZW0.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither XCTW.DE nor XZW0.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XCTW.DE and XZW0.DE in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.95, XCTW.DE and XZW0.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, XCTW.DE or XZW0.DE?

On fees, XCTW.DE is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XCTW.DE or XZW0.DE?

XCTW.DE is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for XZW0.DE.

What is the main difference between XCTW.DE and XZW0.DE?

XCTW.DE tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD, while XZW0.DE tracks MSCI World Low Carbon SRI Leaders. They also come from different issuers: DWS and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for XCTW.DE and 0.20% for XZW0.DE.