XCTW.DE vs. CSY9.DE
XCTW.DE (Xtrackers MSCI World Climate Transition UCITS ETF) and CSY9.DE (CSIF (IE) MSCI World ESG Leaders Minimum Volatility Blue UCITS ETF B USD) are both Global Equities funds - XCTW.DE tracks the MSCI ACWI NR USD while CSY9.DE tracks the MSCI World ESG Leaders Minimum Volatility. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, XCTW.DE returned 16.67%/yr vs 6.65%/yr for CSY9.DE. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XCTW.DE charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for CSY9.DE.
Performance
XCTW.DE vs. CSY9.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XCTW.DE achieves a 9.85% return, which is significantly higher than CSY9.DE's 3.19% return.
XCTW.DE
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 4.92%
- YTD
- 9.85%
- 6M
- 10.34%
- 1Y
- 22.78%
- 3Y*
- 16.67%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CSY9.DE
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- 2.99%
- YTD
- 3.19%
- 6M
- 3.34%
- 1Y
- 3.09%
- 3Y*
- 6.65%
- 5Y*
- 6.22%
- 10Y*
- —
XCTW.DE vs. CSY9.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
XCTW.DE Xtrackers MSCI World Climate Transition UCITS ETF | 9.85% | 7.28% | 25.26% | 12.68% |
CSY9.DE CSIF (IE) MSCI World ESG Leaders Minimum Volatility Blue UCITS ETF B USD | 3.19% | -0.67% | 16.05% | 5.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between XCTW.DE and CSY9.DE is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 10, 2023 | 0.61 |
The correlation between XCTW.DE and CSY9.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XCTW.DE vs. CSY9.DE — Risk / Return Rank
XCTW.DE
CSY9.DE
XCTW.DE vs. CSY9.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Climate Transition UCITS ETF (XCTW.DE) and CSIF (IE) MSCI World ESG Leaders Minimum Volatility Blue UCITS ETF B USD (CSY9.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XCTW.DE | CSY9.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.58 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.07 | +0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.94 | 0.69 | +2.25 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.85 | 1.54 | +10.31 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XCTW.DE | CSY9.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.96 | 0.38 | +1.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.51 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.29 | 0.61 | +0.68 |
Drawdowns
XCTW.DE vs. CSY9.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XCTW.DE drawdown since its inception was -21.64%, which is greater than CSY9.DE's maximum drawdown of -13.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XCTW.DE and CSY9.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XCTW.DE | CSY9.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.64% | -13.92% | -7.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.72% | -4.48% | -3.24% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.64% | -13.92% | -7.72% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -13.92% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.31% | -2.72% | +2.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.65% | -3.70% | +1.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.92% | 2.00% | -0.08% |
Volatility
XCTW.DE vs. CSY9.DE - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers MSCI World Climate Transition UCITS ETF (XCTW.DE) has a higher volatility of 2.68% compared to CSIF (IE) MSCI World ESG Leaders Minimum Volatility Blue UCITS ETF B USD (CSY9.DE) at 2.09%. This indicates that XCTW.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSY9.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XCTW.DE | CSY9.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.68% | 2.09% | +0.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.12% | 5.48% | +2.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.55% | 8.07% | +3.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.16% | 12.03% | +1.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.16% | 11.91% | +1.25% |
XCTW.DE vs. CSY9.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XCTW.DE has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than CSY9.DE's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XCTW.DE vs. CSY9.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither XCTW.DE nor CSY9.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XCTW.DE and CSY9.DE have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XCTW.DE is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XCTW.DE is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for CSY9.DE.
XCTW.DE tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD, while CSY9.DE tracks MSCI World ESG Leaders Minimum Volatility. They also come from different issuers: DWS and Credit Suisse. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for XCTW.DE and 0.25% for CSY9.DE.
Find the right allocation for XCTW.DE and CSY9.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer