PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XCSR.TO vs. TCLV.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XCSR.TO vs. TCLV.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares ESG Advanced MSCI Canada Index ETF (XCSR.TO) and TD Q Canadian Low Volatility ETF (TCLV.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XCSR.TO achieves a 7.96% return, which is significantly higher than TCLV.TO's 4.85% return.


XCSR.TO

1D
1.26%
1M
6.36%
YTD
7.96%
6M
7.56%
1Y
32.34%
3Y*
25.22%
5Y*
13.66%
10Y*

TCLV.TO

1D
0.84%
1M
1.73%
YTD
4.85%
6M
6.47%
1Y
14.56%
3Y*
15.50%
5Y*
11.28%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XCSR.TO vs. TCLV.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
XCSR.TO
iShares ESG Advanced MSCI Canada Index ETF
7.96%35.35%23.27%15.18%-14.41%22.30%21.06%
TCLV.TO
TD Q Canadian Low Volatility ETF
4.85%24.55%17.71%2.95%-0.91%23.83%7.13%

Correlation

The correlation between XCSR.TO and TCLV.TO is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.58

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2020

0.52

The correlation between XCSR.TO and TCLV.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.

XCSR.TO vs. TCLV.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XCSR.TO
TCLV.TO

Financial Services

49.4%
28.5%

Basic Materials

17.5%
5.3%

Technology

14.2%
2.5%

Industrials

6.1%
11.1%

Consumer Defensive

5.7%
17.3%

Consumer Cyclical

3.0%
6.8%

Real Estate

1.5%

-

Communication Services

1.2%
5.7%

Utilities

1.1%
14.2%

Healthcare

0.2%

-

Energy

-

8.7%

Financial Services

XCSR.TO
49.4%
TCLV.TO
28.5%

Basic Materials

XCSR.TO
17.5%
TCLV.TO
5.3%

Technology

XCSR.TO
14.2%
TCLV.TO
2.5%

Industrials

XCSR.TO
6.1%
TCLV.TO
11.1%

Consumer Defensive

XCSR.TO
5.7%
TCLV.TO
17.3%

Consumer Cyclical

XCSR.TO
3.0%
TCLV.TO
6.8%

Real Estate

XCSR.TO
1.5%
TCLV.TO

-

Communication Services

XCSR.TO
1.2%
TCLV.TO
5.7%

Utilities

XCSR.TO
1.1%
TCLV.TO
14.2%

Healthcare

XCSR.TO
0.2%
TCLV.TO

-

Energy

XCSR.TO

-

TCLV.TO
8.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XCSR.TO vs. TCLV.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XCSR.TO
XCSR.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
XCSR.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XCSR.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
XCSR.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
XCSR.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
XCSR.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

TCLV.TO
TCLV.TO Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
TCLV.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TCLV.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
TCLV.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
TCLV.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
TCLV.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XCSR.TO vs. TCLV.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Advanced MSCI Canada Index ETF (XCSR.TO) and TD Q Canadian Low Volatility ETF (TCLV.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XCSR.TOTCLV.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.34

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.92

3.02

-0.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.63

12.11

-0.48

XCSR.TO vs. TCLV.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XCSR.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.15, which is comparable to the TCLV.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XCSR.TO and TCLV.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XCSR.TOTCLV.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.15

1.82

+0.33

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

1.18

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.08

1.33

-1.25

Drawdowns

XCSR.TO vs. TCLV.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XCSR.TO drawdown since its inception was -23.56%, which is greater than TCLV.TO's maximum drawdown of -15.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XCSR.TO and TCLV.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XCSR.TOTCLV.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.56%

-15.27%

-8.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.12%

-4.84%

-6.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.14%

-9.29%

-2.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.56%

-15.27%

-8.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.43%

+0.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.12%

-3.07%

-2.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.79%

1.21%

+1.58%

Volatility

XCSR.TO vs. TCLV.TO - Volatility Comparison

iShares ESG Advanced MSCI Canada Index ETF (XCSR.TO) has a higher volatility of 4.09% compared to TD Q Canadian Low Volatility ETF (TCLV.TO) at 2.50%. This indicates that XCSR.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TCLV.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XCSR.TOTCLV.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.09%

2.50%

+1.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.50%

6.34%

+6.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.11%

8.06%

+7.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.95%

9.61%

+4.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1,367.87%

9.77%

+1,358.10%

XCSR.TO vs. TCLV.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XCSR.TO has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is lower than TCLV.TO's 0.33% expense ratio.


Dividends

XCSR.TO vs. TCLV.TO - Dividend Comparison

XCSR.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.63%, less than TCLV.TO's 1.84% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
TCLV.TO
TD Q Canadian Low Volatility ETF
1.84%1.89%2.68%3.15%2.84%2.64%1.59%
XCSR.TO
iShares ESG Advanced MSCI Canada Index ETF
1.63%1.73%2.20%2.61%2.78%1.53%0.81%

Frequently Asked Questions


XCSR.TO and TCLV.TO have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XCSR.TO is cheaper at 0.17% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XCSR.TO is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.33% for TCLV.TO.

They also come from different issuers: iShares and TD. Their fees differ too: 0.17% for XCSR.TO and 0.33% for TCLV.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XCSR.TO and TCLV.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer