PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XCSR.TO vs. HXCN.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XCSR.TO vs. HXCN.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares ESG Advanced MSCI Canada Index ETF (XCSR.TO) and Global X S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index Corporate Class ETF (HXCN.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XCSR.TO achieves a 6.62% return, which is significantly lower than HXCN.TO's 10.69% return.


XCSR.TO

1D
-1.10%
1M
4.20%
YTD
6.62%
6M
7.53%
1Y
30.67%
3Y*
24.50%
5Y*
13.38%
10Y*

HXCN.TO

1D
-0.96%
1M
3.65%
YTD
10.69%
6M
12.85%
1Y
34.40%
3Y*
23.53%
5Y*
14.86%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XCSR.TO vs. HXCN.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
XCSR.TO
iShares ESG Advanced MSCI Canada Index ETF
6.62%35.35%23.27%15.18%-14.41%22.30%4,511.52%
HXCN.TO
Global X S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index Corporate Class ETF
10.69%31.20%21.60%11.98%-6.07%25.23%24.50%

Correlation

The correlation between XCSR.TO and HXCN.TO is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 23, 2020

0.83

The correlation between XCSR.TO and HXCN.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

XCSR.TO vs. HXCN.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XCSR.TO
HXCN.TO

Financial Services

49.4%
32.1%

Basic Materials

17.5%
15.6%

Technology

14.2%
11.2%

Industrials

6.1%
11.1%

Consumer Defensive

5.7%
3.2%

Consumer Cyclical

3.0%
3.8%

Real Estate

1.5%
1.8%

Communication Services

1.2%
2.1%

Utilities

1.1%
3.4%

Healthcare

0.2%
0.1%

Energy

-

15.7%

Financial Services

XCSR.TO
49.4%
HXCN.TO
32.1%

Basic Materials

XCSR.TO
17.5%
HXCN.TO
15.6%

Technology

XCSR.TO
14.2%
HXCN.TO
11.2%

Industrials

XCSR.TO
6.1%
HXCN.TO
11.1%

Consumer Defensive

XCSR.TO
5.7%
HXCN.TO
3.2%

Consumer Cyclical

XCSR.TO
3.0%
HXCN.TO
3.8%

Real Estate

XCSR.TO
1.5%
HXCN.TO
1.8%

Communication Services

XCSR.TO
1.2%
HXCN.TO
2.1%

Utilities

XCSR.TO
1.1%
HXCN.TO
3.4%

Healthcare

XCSR.TO
0.2%
HXCN.TO
0.1%

Energy

XCSR.TO

-

HXCN.TO
15.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XCSR.TO vs. HXCN.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XCSR.TO
XCSR.TO Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
XCSR.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XCSR.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
XCSR.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
XCSR.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
XCSR.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

HXCN.TO
HXCN.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
HXCN.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HXCN.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
HXCN.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
HXCN.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
HXCN.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XCSR.TO vs. HXCN.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Advanced MSCI Canada Index ETF (XCSR.TO) and Global X S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index Corporate Class ETF (HXCN.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XCSR.TOHXCN.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.70

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.77

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.49

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.77

3.92

-1.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.03

17.26

-6.23

XCSR.TO vs. HXCN.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XCSR.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.04, which is comparable to the HXCN.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XCSR.TO and HXCN.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XCSR.TOHXCN.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.04

2.74

-0.70

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

1.09

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.08

0.82

-0.74

Drawdowns

XCSR.TO vs. HXCN.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XCSR.TO drawdown since its inception was -23.56%, smaller than the maximum HXCN.TO drawdown of -37.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XCSR.TO and HXCN.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XCSR.TOHXCN.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.56%

-37.09%

+13.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.12%

-8.81%

-2.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.14%

-12.49%

+0.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.56%

-16.27%

-7.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.10%

-0.96%

-0.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.12%

-4.11%

-1.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.79%

2.00%

+0.79%

Volatility

XCSR.TO vs. HXCN.TO - Volatility Comparison

iShares ESG Advanced MSCI Canada Index ETF (XCSR.TO) has a higher volatility of 4.10% compared to Global X S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index Corporate Class ETF (HXCN.TO) at 3.48%. This indicates that XCSR.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HXCN.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XCSR.TOHXCN.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.10%

3.48%

+0.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.45%

10.04%

+2.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.07%

12.60%

+2.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.94%

13.72%

+0.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1,368.32%

17.81%

+1,350.51%

XCSR.TO vs. HXCN.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XCSR.TO has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is higher than HXCN.TO's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XCSR.TO vs. HXCN.TO - Dividend Comparison

XCSR.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.65%, while HXCN.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
HXCN.TO
Global X S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index Corporate Class ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XCSR.TO
iShares ESG Advanced MSCI Canada Index ETF
1.65%1.73%2.20%2.61%2.78%1.53%0.81%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, XCSR.TO and HXCN.TO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, HXCN.TO is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HXCN.TO is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.17% for XCSR.TO.

XCSR.TO tracks Morningstar Canada GR CAD, while HXCN.TO tracks S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.17% for XCSR.TO and 0.05% for HXCN.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XCSR.TO and HXCN.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer