XCSR.TO vs. EAOR
XCSR.TO (iShares ESG Advanced MSCI Canada Index ETF) and EAOR (iShares ESG Aware Growth Allocation ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XCSR.TO is a Canada Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Canada GR CAD, while EAOR is a Diversified Portfolio fund tracking the BlackRock ESG Aware Growth Allocation Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XCSR.TO returned 13.71%/yr vs 9.17%/yr for EAOR. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XCSR.TO charges 0.17%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for EAOR.
Performance
XCSR.TO vs. EAOR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
XCSR.TO is traded in CAD, while EAOR is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the EAOR values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XCSR.TO achieves a 8.85% return, which is significantly lower than EAOR's 10.52% return.
XCSR.TO
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- 2.55%
- YTD
- 8.85%
- 6M
- 4.99%
- 1Y
- 30.52%
- 3Y*
- 26.52%
- 5Y*
- 13.71%
- 10Y*
- —
EAOR
- 1D
- 0.42%
- 1M
- 3.52%
- YTD
- 10.52%
- 6M
- 9.93%
- 1Y
- 20.35%
- 3Y*
- 16.31%
- 5Y*
- 9.17%
- 10Y*
- —
XCSR.TO vs. EAOR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XCSR.TO iShares ESG Advanced MSCI Canada Index ETF | 8.85% | 35.36% | 24.42% | 15.21% | -14.41% | 22.32% | 21.06% |
EAOR iShares ESG Aware Growth Allocation ETF | 10.52% | 10.31% | 20.06% | 12.22% | -11.38% | 10.45% | 7.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between XCSR.TO and EAOR is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2020 | 0.57 |
The correlation between XCSR.TO and EAOR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XCSR.TO vs. EAOR — Risk / Return Rank
XCSR.TO
EAOR
XCSR.TO vs. EAOR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Advanced MSCI Canada Index ETF (XCSR.TO) and iShares ESG Aware Growth Allocation ETF (EAOR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XCSR.TO | EAOR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.36 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.76 | 3.66 | -0.90 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.92 | 13.09 | -2.17 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XCSR.TO vs. EAOR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XCSR.TO drawdown since its inception was -23.56%, which is greater than EAOR's maximum drawdown of -18.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XCSR.TO and EAOR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XCSR.TO | EAOR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.56% | -18.16% | -5.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.12% | -5.58% | -5.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.14% | -11.59% | -0.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.56% | -18.16% | -5.40% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.06% | -0.82% | -0.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.08% | -3.97% | -1.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.80% | 1.56% | +1.24% |
Volatility
XCSR.TO vs. EAOR - Volatility Comparison
iShares ESG Advanced MSCI Canada Index ETF (XCSR.TO) and iShares ESG Aware Growth Allocation ETF (EAOR) have volatilities of 4.16% and 4.10%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XCSR.TO | EAOR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.16% | 4.10% | +0.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.73% | 8.23% | +4.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.44% | 9.91% | +5.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.15% | 12.21% | +1.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.51% | 12.20% | +2.31% |
XCSR.TO vs. EAOR - Expense Ratio Comparison
XCSR.TO has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is lower than EAOR's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XCSR.TO vs. EAOR - Dividend Comparison
XCSR.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.62%, less than EAOR's 2.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EAOR iShares ESG Aware Growth Allocation ETF | 2.36% | 2.45% | 2.52% | 2.39% | 1.99% | 1.39% | 1.07% |
XCSR.TO iShares ESG Advanced MSCI Canada Index ETF | 1.62% | 1.74% | 2.20% | 2.64% | 2.78% | 1.54% | 0.81% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XCSR.TO and EAOR have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XCSR.TO is cheaper at 0.17% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XCSR.TO is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for EAOR.
XCSR.TO is categorized as Canada Equities, while EAOR is Diversified Portfolio. XCSR.TO tracks Morningstar Canada GR CAD, while EAOR tracks BlackRock ESG Aware Growth Allocation Index. Their fees differ too: 0.17% for XCSR.TO and 0.18% for EAOR.
Find the right allocation for XCSR.TO and EAOR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer