PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
XCSR.TO vs. EAOR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

XCSR.TO vs. EAOR

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

XCSR.TO (iShares ESG Advanced MSCI Canada Index ETF) and EAOR (iShares ESG Aware Growth Allocation ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XCSR.TO is a Canada Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Canada GR CAD, while EAOR is a Diversified Portfolio fund tracking the BlackRock ESG Aware Growth Allocation Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XCSR.TO returned 13.66%/yr vs 9.53%/yr for EAOR. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XCSR.TO charges 0.17%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for EAOR.

Performance

XCSR.TO vs. EAOR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares ESG Advanced MSCI Canada Index ETF (XCSR.TO) and iShares ESG Aware Growth Allocation ETF (EAOR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XCSR.TO is traded in CAD, while EAOR is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the EAOR values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XCSR.TO achieves a 7.96% return, which is significantly lower than EAOR's 9.26% return.

XCSR.TO

1D
1.26%
1M
6.36%
YTD
7.96%
6M
7.56%
1Y
32.34%
3Y*
25.22%
5Y*
13.66%
10Y*
—

EAOR

1D
0.35%
1M
5.11%
YTD
9.26%
6M
7.76%
1Y
21.38%
3Y*
15.34%
5Y*
9.53%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XCSR.TO vs. EAOR - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
XCSR.TO
iShares ESG Advanced MSCI Canada Index ETF		7.96%35.35%23.27%15.18%-14.41%22.30%20.32%
EAOR
iShares ESG Aware Growth Allocation ETF		9.26%10.29%20.20%12.43%-10.73%9.51%7.87%

Correlation

The correlation between XCSR.TO and EAOR is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.61

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 19, 2020

0.56

The correlation between XCSR.TO and EAOR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.

XCSR.TO vs. EAOR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
XCSR.TO
EAOR

Financial Services

49.4%
10.3%

Basic Materials

17.5%
1.8%

Technology

14.2%
22.3%

Industrials

6.1%
6.8%

Consumer Defensive

5.7%
2.8%

Consumer Cyclical

3.0%
5.8%

Real Estate

1.5%
1.2%

Communication Services

1.2%
5.6%

Utilities

1.1%
1.7%

Healthcare

0.2%
5.2%

Energy

-

2.3%

Financial Services

XCSR.TO
49.4%
EAOR
10.3%

Basic Materials

XCSR.TO
17.5%
EAOR
1.8%

Technology

XCSR.TO
14.2%
EAOR
22.3%

Industrials

XCSR.TO
6.1%
EAOR
6.8%

Consumer Defensive

XCSR.TO
5.7%
EAOR
2.8%

Consumer Cyclical

XCSR.TO
3.0%
EAOR
5.8%

Real Estate

XCSR.TO
1.5%
EAOR
1.2%

Communication Services

XCSR.TO
1.2%
EAOR
5.6%

Utilities

XCSR.TO
1.1%
EAOR
1.7%

Healthcare

XCSR.TO
0.2%
EAOR
5.2%

Energy

XCSR.TO

-

EAOR
2.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares ESG Advanced MSCI Canada Index ETF

iShares ESG Aware Growth Allocation ETF

Often compared with XCSR.TO:
XCSR.TO vs. XESG.TOXCSR.TO vs. XCS.TOXCSR.TO vs. XUSR.TOXCSR.TO vs. XEN.TOXCSR.TO vs. XMD.TOXCSR.TO vs. XIT.TOXCSR.TO vs. CSIQ
Often compared with EAOR:
EAOR vs. AOREAOR vs. EAOAEAOR vs. GBAL.TOEAOR vs. EFRAEAOR vs. XUSR.TOEAOR vs. GALEAOR vs. OCIO

Return for Risk

XCSR.TO vs. EAOR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
XCSR.TO
XCSR.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
XCSR.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XCSR.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
XCSR.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
XCSR.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
XCSR.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
EAOR
EAOR Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
EAOR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EAOR Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
EAOR Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
EAOR Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
EAOR Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XCSR.TO vs. EAOR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Advanced MSCI Canada Index ETF (XCSR.TO) and iShares ESG Aware Growth Allocation ETF (EAOR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

XCSR.TOEAORDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.15
2.54

-0.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.89
3.59

-0.71

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.49

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.92

3.94

-1.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.63

15.08

-3.45

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XCSR.TO vs. EAOR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XCSR.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.15, which is comparable to the EAOR Sharpe Ratio of 2.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XCSR.TO and EAOR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

XCSR.TOEAORDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.15

2.54

-0.39

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

1.08

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.08

1.10

-1.02

Drawdowns

XCSR.TO vs. EAOR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XCSR.TO drawdown since its inception was -23.56%, which is greater than EAOR's maximum drawdown of -17.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XCSR.TO and EAOR.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

XCSR.TOEAORDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.56%

-17.61%

-5.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.12%

-5.46%

-5.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.14%

-10.96%

-1.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.56%

-17.61%

-5.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.12%

-3.84%

-1.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.79%

1.42%

+1.37%

Volatility

XCSR.TO vs. EAOR - Volatility Comparison

iShares ESG Advanced MSCI Canada Index ETF (XCSR.TO) has a higher volatility of 4.09% compared to iShares ESG Aware Growth Allocation ETF (EAOR) at 2.56%. This indicates that XCSR.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EAOR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

XCSR.TOEAORDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.09%

2.56%

+1.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.50%

6.86%

+5.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.11%

8.46%

+6.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.95%

8.84%

+5.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1,367.87%

8.68%

+1,359.19%

XCSR.TO vs. EAOR - Expense Ratio Comparison

XCSR.TO has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is lower than EAOR's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

XCSR.TO vs. EAOR - Dividend Comparison

XCSR.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.63%, less than EAOR's 2.33% yield.

PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
EAOR
iShares ESG Aware Growth Allocation ETF		2.33%2.45%2.52%2.39%1.99%1.39%1.07%
XCSR.TO
iShares ESG Advanced MSCI Canada Index ETF		1.63%1.73%2.20%2.61%2.78%1.53%0.81%

Frequently Asked Questions

XCSR.TO and EAOR have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XCSR.TO is cheaper at 0.17% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XCSR.TO is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for EAOR.

XCSR.TO is categorized as Canada Equities, while EAOR is Diversified Portfolio. XCSR.TO tracks Morningstar Canada GR CAD, while EAOR tracks BlackRock ESG Aware Growth Allocation Index. Their fees differ too: 0.17% for XCSR.TO and 0.18% for EAOR.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XCSR.TO and EAOR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer