XCS6.DE vs. M9SV.DE
XCS6.DE (Xtrackers MSCI China UCITS ETF 1C) and M9SV.DE (Market Access STOXX China A Minimum Variance Index UCITS ETF C EUR) are both China Equities funds - XCS6.DE tracks the MSCI China while M9SV.DE tracks the STOXX China A 900 Minimum Variance Unconstrained AM Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XCS6.DE returned -4.29%/yr vs 4.91%/yr for M9SV.DE. At a 0.50 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XCS6.DE charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for M9SV.DE.
Performance
XCS6.DE vs. M9SV.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XCS6.DE achieves a -7.60% return, which is significantly lower than M9SV.DE's -2.87% return.
XCS6.DE
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- 2.25%
- 6M
- -12.81%
- YTD
- -7.60%
- 1Y
- 0.82%
- 3Y*
- 7.59%
- 5Y*
- -4.29%
- 10Y*
- 3.67%
M9SV.DE
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- -1.84%
- 6M
- -5.02%
- YTD
- -2.87%
- 1Y
- 3.05%
- 3Y*
- 7.54%
- 5Y*
- 4.91%
- 10Y*
- —
XCS6.DE vs. M9SV.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XCS6.DE Xtrackers MSCI China UCITS ETF 1C | -7.60% | 16.41% | 27.02% | -15.14% | -15.45% | -17.26% | 15.12% | 26.93% | -23.29% |
M9SV.DE Market Access STOXX China A Minimum Variance Index UCITS ETF C EUR | -2.87% | -5.32% | 37.47% | 2.90% | -11.14% | 18.00% | 14.68% | 7.74% | -16.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between XCS6.DE and M9SV.DE is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 7, 2018 | 0.50 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XCS6.DE vs. M9SV.DE — Risk / Return Rank
XCS6.DE
M9SV.DE
XCS6.DE vs. M9SV.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI China UCITS ETF 1C (XCS6.DE) and Market Access STOXX China A Minimum Variance Index UCITS ETF C EUR (M9SV.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XCS6.DE | M9SV.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.02 | 1.05 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.04 | 0.42 | -0.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.08 | 0.95 | -0.87 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XCS6.DE vs. M9SV.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XCS6.DE drawdown since its inception was -56.31%, which is greater than M9SV.DE's maximum drawdown of -23.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XCS6.DE and M9SV.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XCS6.DE | M9SV.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.31% | -23.79% | -32.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.55% | -7.28% | -14.27% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.75% | -23.79% | -0.96% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -46.98% | -23.79% | -23.19% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -56.31% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -33.85% | -16.41% | -17.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.29% | -9.52% | -11.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.42% | 3.20% | +7.22% |
Volatility
XCS6.DE vs. M9SV.DE - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers MSCI China UCITS ETF 1C (XCS6.DE) has a higher volatility of 5.57% compared to Market Access STOXX China A Minimum Variance Index UCITS ETF C EUR (M9SV.DE) at 3.37%. This indicates that XCS6.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than M9SV.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XCS6.DE | M9SV.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.57% | 3.37% | +2.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.44% | 7.32% | +6.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.92% | 11.07% | +7.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.63% | 20.42% | +7.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.28% | 21.48% | +3.80% |
XCS6.DE vs. M9SV.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XCS6.DE has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than M9SV.DE's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
XCS6.DE vs. M9SV.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither XCS6.DE nor M9SV.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XCS6.DE and M9SV.DE have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, M9SV.DE is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
M9SV.DE is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for XCS6.DE.
XCS6.DE tracks MSCI China, while M9SV.DE tracks STOXX China A 900 Minimum Variance Unconstrained AM Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Market Access. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for XCS6.DE and 0.45% for M9SV.DE.
Find the right allocation for XCS6.DE and M9SV.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer