PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XCS4.DE vs. V3PA.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XCS4.DE vs. V3PA.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI Thailand UCITS ETF 1C (XCS4.DE) and Vanguard ESG Developed Asia Pacific All Cap UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (V3PA.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XCS4.DE achieves a 29.46% return, which is significantly lower than V3PA.DE's 31.55% return.


XCS4.DE

1D
0.72%
1M
5.08%
YTD
29.46%
6M
30.06%
1Y
51.12%
3Y*
7.20%
5Y*
5.01%
10Y*
4.54%

V3PA.DE

1D
-1.34%
1M
7.31%
YTD
31.55%
6M
33.90%
1Y
51.00%
3Y*
19.30%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XCS4.DE vs. V3PA.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
XCS4.DE
Xtrackers MSCI Thailand UCITS ETF 1C
29.46%-3.83%7.49%-15.52%9.83%
V3PA.DE
Vanguard ESG Developed Asia Pacific All Cap UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating
31.55%16.47%7.66%10.91%3.89%

Correlation

The correlation between XCS4.DE and V3PA.DE is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2022

0.40

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XCS4.DE vs. V3PA.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XCS4.DE
XCS4.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
XCS4.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XCS4.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
XCS4.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
XCS4.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
XCS4.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

V3PA.DE
V3PA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
V3PA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
V3PA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
V3PA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
V3PA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
V3PA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XCS4.DE vs. V3PA.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Thailand UCITS ETF 1C (XCS4.DE) and Vanguard ESG Developed Asia Pacific All Cap UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (V3PA.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XCS4.DEV3PA.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.52

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.91

4.43

+0.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.58

16.46

-1.89

XCS4.DE vs. V3PA.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XCS4.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.35, which is comparable to the V3PA.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XCS4.DE and V3PA.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XCS4.DEV3PA.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.35

2.80

-0.45

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.23

1.25

-1.01

Drawdowns

XCS4.DE vs. V3PA.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XCS4.DE drawdown since its inception was -45.06%, which is greater than V3PA.DE's maximum drawdown of -17.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XCS4.DE and V3PA.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XCS4.DEV3PA.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.06%

-17.58%

-27.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.38%

-11.44%

+1.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.85%

-17.58%

-12.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.16%

-1.83%

+1.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.35%

-2.80%

-12.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.50%

3.08%

+0.42%

Volatility

XCS4.DE vs. V3PA.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI Thailand UCITS ETF 1C (XCS4.DE) is 5.83%, while Vanguard ESG Developed Asia Pacific All Cap UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (V3PA.DE) has a volatility of 6.33%. This indicates that XCS4.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than V3PA.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XCS4.DEV3PA.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.83%

6.33%

-0.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.61%

15.56%

+1.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.68%

18.10%

+3.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.74%

15.34%

+2.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.70%

15.34%

+4.36%

XCS4.DE vs. V3PA.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XCS4.DE has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than V3PA.DE's 0.17% expense ratio.


Dividends

XCS4.DE vs. V3PA.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither XCS4.DE nor V3PA.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


XCS4.DE and V3PA.DE have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, V3PA.DE is cheaper at 0.17% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

V3PA.DE is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for XCS4.DE.

XCS4.DE tracks MSCI Thailand, while V3PA.DE tracks FTSE Developed Asia Pacific All Cap Choice. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for XCS4.DE and 0.17% for V3PA.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XCS4.DE and V3PA.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer