PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XCS2.DE vs. VUDY.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XCS2.DE vs. VUDY.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers II Australia Government Bond UCITS ETF (Acc) (XCS2.DE) and Vanguard U.S. Treasury 1-3 Year Bond UCITS ETF USD Distributing (VUDY.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XCS2.DE achieves a 8.74% return, which is significantly higher than VUDY.DE's 3.51% return.


XCS2.DE

1D
0.64%
1M
0.17%
6M
8.57%
YTD
8.74%
1Y
9.20%
3Y*
2.45%
5Y*
-1.91%
10Y*
-0.09%

VUDY.DE

1D
0.03%
1M
1.72%
6M
3.39%
YTD
3.51%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XCS2.DE vs. VUDY.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between XCS2.DE and VUDY.DE is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2025

-0.09

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XCS2.DE vs. VUDY.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XCS2.DE
XCS2.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
XCS2.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XCS2.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
XCS2.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
XCS2.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
XCS2.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

VUDY.DE

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XCS2.DE vs. VUDY.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers II Australia Government Bond UCITS ETF (Acc) (XCS2.DE) and Vanguard U.S. Treasury 1-3 Year Bond UCITS ETF USD Distributing (VUDY.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XCS2.DEVUDY.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.68

XCS2.DE vs. VUDY.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XCS2.DE vs. VUDY.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XCS2.DE drawdown since its inception was -41.58%, which is greater than VUDY.DE's maximum drawdown of -3.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XCS2.DE and VUDY.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XCS2.DEVUDY.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.58%

-3.56%

-38.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-32.78%

-0.63%

-32.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.75%

-1.33%

-24.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.37%

Volatility

XCS2.DE vs. VUDY.DE - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XCS2.DEVUDY.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.80%

5.20%

+3.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.13%

5.20%

+4.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.02%

5.20%

+15.82%

XCS2.DE vs. VUDY.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XCS2.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than VUDY.DE's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XCS2.DE vs. VUDY.DE - Dividend Comparison

XCS2.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VUDY.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.18%.


Frequently Asked Questions


XCS2.DE and VUDY.DE have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VUDY.DE is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VUDY.DE is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XCS2.DE.

XCS2.DE tracks FTSE Australian Government Bond Index, while VUDY.DE tracks Bloomberg US Treasury 1-3 Year Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XCS2.DE and 0.05% for VUDY.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XCS2.DE and VUDY.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer