XCOU.L vs. LQEE.L
XCOU.L (Lyxor Global Green Bond 1-10Y UCITS ETF USD Hedged Acc) and LQEE.L (iShares $ Corp Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Dist)) are both Global Corporate Bonds funds - XCOU.L tracks the Bloomberg Gbl Agg Corp 0901 TR Hdg USD while LQEE.L tracks the IBOXX US Dollar Liquid Investment Grade Index (USD). Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, XCOU.L returned 5.36%/yr vs 2.89%/yr for LQEE.L. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XCOU.L charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for LQEE.L.
Performance
XCOU.L vs. LQEE.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
XCOU.L is traded in USD, while LQEE.L is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the LQEE.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XCOU.L achieves a 0.81% return, which is significantly higher than LQEE.L's -4.18% return.
XCOU.L
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- -0.54%
- 6M
- 0.50%
- YTD
- 0.81%
- 1Y
- 2.84%
- 3Y*
- 5.36%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LQEE.L
- 1D
- 0.24%
- 1M
- -1.51%
- 6M
- -2.71%
- YTD
- -4.18%
- 1Y
- 0.71%
- 3Y*
- 2.89%
- 5Y*
- -3.43%
- 10Y*
- —
XCOU.L vs. LQEE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XCOU.L Lyxor Global Green Bond 1-10Y UCITS ETF USD Hedged Acc | 0.81% | 5.28% | 4.41% | 8.47% | -4.13% |
LQEE.L iShares $ Corp Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Dist) | -4.18% | 19.91% | -6.83% | 9.50% | -4.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between XCOU.L and LQEE.L is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 11, 2022 | 0.56 |
The correlation between XCOU.L and LQEE.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XCOU.L vs. LQEE.L — Risk / Return Rank
XCOU.L
LQEE.L
XCOU.L vs. LQEE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor Global Green Bond 1-10Y UCITS ETF USD Hedged Acc (XCOU.L) and iShares $ Corp Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Dist) (LQEE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XCOU.L | LQEE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.02 | +0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.21 | 0.09 | +1.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.83 | 0.20 | +3.63 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XCOU.L vs. LQEE.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XCOU.L drawdown since its inception was -7.95%, smaller than the maximum LQEE.L drawdown of -41.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XCOU.L and LQEE.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XCOU.L | LQEE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.95% | -41.63% | +33.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.46% | -7.52% | +5.06% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -2.46% | -14.38% | +11.92% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -39.40% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.92% | -20.48% | +19.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.52% | -16.56% | +15.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.78% | 3.51% | -2.73% |
Volatility
XCOU.L vs. LQEE.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Lyxor Global Green Bond 1-10Y UCITS ETF USD Hedged Acc (XCOU.L) is 0.75%, while iShares $ Corp Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Dist) (LQEE.L) has a volatility of 1.92%. This indicates that XCOU.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LQEE.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XCOU.L | LQEE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.75% | 1.92% | -1.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.28% | 6.95% | -4.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.66% | 9.72% | -7.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.06% | 12.91% | -8.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.06% | 12.61% | -8.55% |
XCOU.L vs. LQEE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XCOU.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than LQEE.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XCOU.L vs. LQEE.L - Dividend Comparison
XCOU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LQEE.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.02%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LQEE.L iShares $ Corp Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Dist) | 5.02% | 4.75% | 5.02% | 4.58% | 3.79% | 2.69% | 2.69% | 3.45% | 3.76% | 0.65% |
XCOU.L Lyxor Global Green Bond 1-10Y UCITS ETF USD Hedged Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XCOU.L and LQEE.L have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XCOU.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XCOU.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for LQEE.L.
XCOU.L tracks Bloomberg Gbl Agg Corp 0901 TR Hdg USD, while LQEE.L tracks IBOXX US Dollar Liquid Investment Grade Index (USD). They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for XCOU.L and 0.25% for LQEE.L.
Find the right allocation for XCOU.L and LQEE.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer