PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XCOU.L vs. IHHG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XCOU.L vs. IHHG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lyxor Global Green Bond 1-10Y UCITS ETF USD Hedged Acc (XCOU.L) and iShares $ High Yield Corp Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (IHHG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XCOU.L is traded in USD, while IHHG.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the IHHG.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XCOU.L achieves a 0.81% return, which is significantly lower than IHHG.L's 1.53% return.


XCOU.L

1D
-0.08%
1M
-0.54%
6M
0.50%
YTD
0.81%
1Y
2.84%
3Y*
5.36%
5Y*
10Y*

IHHG.L

1D
-0.45%
1M
1.44%
6M
1.67%
YTD
1.53%
1Y
6.04%
3Y*
8.52%
5Y*
2.64%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XCOU.L vs. IHHG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
XCOU.L
Lyxor Global Green Bond 1-10Y UCITS ETF USD Hedged Acc
0.81%5.28%4.41%8.47%-4.13%
IHHG.L
iShares $ High Yield Corp Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist)
1.53%17.26%4.61%15.56%-3.18%

Correlation

The correlation between XCOU.L and IHHG.L is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 11, 2022

0.36

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XCOU.L vs. IHHG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XCOU.L
XCOU.L Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
XCOU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XCOU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
XCOU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
XCOU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
XCOU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

IHHG.L
IHHG.L Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
IHHG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IHHG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
IHHG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
IHHG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
IHHG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XCOU.L vs. IHHG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor Global Green Bond 1-10Y UCITS ETF USD Hedged Acc (XCOU.L) and iShares $ High Yield Corp Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (IHHG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XCOU.LIHHG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.12

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.21

0.90

+0.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.83

2.38

+1.45

XCOU.L vs. IHHG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XCOU.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.12, which is higher than the IHHG.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XCOU.L and IHHG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XCOU.L vs. IHHG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XCOU.L drawdown since its inception was -7.95%, smaller than the maximum IHHG.L drawdown of -34.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XCOU.L and IHHG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XCOU.LIHHG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.95%

-34.42%

+26.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.46%

-6.71%

+4.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.46%

-9.62%

+7.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.92%

-1.76%

+0.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.52%

-8.65%

+7.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.78%

2.54%

-1.76%

Volatility

XCOU.L vs. IHHG.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lyxor Global Green Bond 1-10Y UCITS ETF USD Hedged Acc (XCOU.L) is 0.75%, while iShares $ High Yield Corp Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (IHHG.L) has a volatility of 1.98%. This indicates that XCOU.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IHHG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XCOU.LIHHG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.75%

1.98%

-1.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.28%

6.40%

-4.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.66%

8.56%

-5.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.06%

12.65%

-8.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.06%

13.56%

-9.50%

XCOU.L vs. IHHG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XCOU.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than IHHG.L's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

XCOU.L vs. IHHG.L - Dividend Comparison

XCOU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IHHG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.15%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
IHHG.L
iShares $ High Yield Corp Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist)
6.15%6.06%6.23%5.55%5.21%4.25%4.89%5.47%3.58%
XCOU.L
Lyxor Global Green Bond 1-10Y UCITS ETF USD Hedged Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XCOU.L and IHHG.L have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XCOU.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XCOU.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for IHHG.L.

XCOU.L is categorized as Global Corporate Bonds, while IHHG.L is Corporate Bonds. XCOU.L tracks Bloomberg Gbl Agg Corp 0901 TR Hdg USD, while IHHG.L tracks iBoxx USD Liquid High Yield Capped (USD). They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for XCOU.L and 0.55% for IHHG.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XCOU.L and IHHG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer