XCO2.L vs. V3GP.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Lyxor Global Green Bond 1-10 Y (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc (XCO2.L) and Vanguard ESG Global Corporate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Distributing (V3GP.L).
XCO2.L and V3GP.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XCO2.L is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Gbl Agg Corp TR USD. It was launched on Sep 13, 2019. V3GP.L is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Gbl Agg Corp TR Hdg GBP. It was launched on May 20, 2021. Both XCO2.L and V3GP.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
XCO2.L vs. V3GP.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
XCO2.L vs. V3GP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XCO2.L Lyxor Global Green Bond 1-10 Y (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc | -0.25% | 4.08% |
V3GP.L Vanguard ESG Global Corporate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Distributing | -0.37% | 4.51% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XCO2.L achieves a -0.25% return, which is significantly higher than V3GP.L's -0.37% return.
XCO2.L
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- -1.35%
- YTD
- -0.25%
- 6M
- 0.04%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
V3GP.L
- 1D
- 0.24%
- 1M
- -1.21%
- YTD
- -0.37%
- 6M
- 0.26%
- 1Y
- 4.37%
- 3Y*
- 4.69%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XCO2.L vs. V3GP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both XCO2.L and V3GP.L have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
XCO2.L vs. V3GP.L — Risk / Return Rank
XCO2.L
V3GP.L
XCO2.L vs. V3GP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor Global Green Bond 1-10 Y (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc (XCO2.L) and Vanguard ESG Global Corporate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Distributing (V3GP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XCO2.L | V3GP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.06 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.94 | 0.36 | +0.58 |
Correlation
The correlation between XCO2.L and V3GP.L is 0.39, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
XCO2.L vs. V3GP.L - Dividend Comparison
XCO2.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while V3GP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.41%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XCO2.L Lyxor Global Green Bond 1-10 Y (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
V3GP.L Vanguard ESG Global Corporate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Distributing | 4.41% | 4.43% | 4.36% | 4.10% | 2.48% | 11.63% |
Drawdowns
XCO2.L vs. V3GP.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XCO2.L drawdown since its inception was -3.63%, smaller than the maximum V3GP.L drawdown of -20.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XCO2.L and V3GP.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| XCO2.L | V3GP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.63% | -20.15% | +16.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -2.67% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.44% | -1.59% | -0.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.90% | -8.01% | +7.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.68% | — |
Volatility
XCO2.L vs. V3GP.L - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| XCO2.L | V3GP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.80% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 2.46% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.36% | 4.10% | +0.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.36% | 7.71% | -3.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.36% | 7.71% | -3.35% |