PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XCO2.L vs. SP5L.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XCO2.L vs. SP5L.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Lyxor Global Green Bond 1-10 Y (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc (XCO2.L) and Lyxor S&P 500 UCITS ETF - Acc (SP5L.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XCO2.L achieves a -1.75% return, which is significantly lower than SP5L.L's 10.09% return.


XCO2.L

1D
-0.61%
1M
-1.93%
6M
-1.69%
YTD
-1.75%
1Y
0.06%
3Y*
3.51%
5Y*
-1.27%
10Y*

SP5L.L

1D
-0.54%
1M
-0.32%
6M
9.61%
YTD
10.09%
1Y
21.06%
3Y*
18.94%
5Y*
13.71%
10Y*
12.87%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XCO2.L vs. SP5L.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
XCO2.L
Lyxor Global Green Bond 1-10 Y (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc
-1.75%5.87%-0.13%3.77%-10.53%-9.16%-7.36%
SP5L.L
Lyxor S&P 500 UCITS ETF - Acc
10.09%9.50%27.60%19.99%-8.84%31.19%21.84%

Correlation

The correlation between XCO2.L and SP5L.L is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 4, 2020

0.11

The correlation between XCO2.L and SP5L.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.11 (all time) to 0.24 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XCO2.L vs. SP5L.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XCO2.L
XCO2.L Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
XCO2.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XCO2.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
XCO2.L Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
XCO2.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
XCO2.L Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

SP5L.L
SP5L.L Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
SP5L.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SP5L.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
SP5L.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
SP5L.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
SP5L.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XCO2.L vs. SP5L.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor Global Green Bond 1-10 Y (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc (XCO2.L) and Lyxor S&P 500 UCITS ETF - Acc (SP5L.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XCO2.LSP5L.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.88

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

1.35

-0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.02

2.91

-2.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.04

10.24

-10.21

XCO2.L vs. SP5L.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XCO2.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.01, which is lower than the SP5L.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XCO2.L and SP5L.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XCO2.L vs. SP5L.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XCO2.L drawdown since its inception was -29.59%, which is greater than SP5L.L's maximum drawdown of -25.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XCO2.L and SP5L.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XCO2.LSP5L.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.59%

-25.47%

-4.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.95%

-7.20%

+3.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.43%

-21.12%

+7.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.63%

-21.12%

+3.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-21.06%

-1.04%

-20.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.14%

-5.14%

-15.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.75%

2.05%

-0.30%

Volatility

XCO2.L vs. SP5L.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lyxor Global Green Bond 1-10 Y (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc (XCO2.L) is 1.19%, while Lyxor S&P 500 UCITS ETF - Acc (SP5L.L) has a volatility of 3.14%. This indicates that XCO2.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SP5L.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XCO2.LSP5L.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.19%

3.14%

-1.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.31%

7.95%

-4.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.22%

11.09%

-6.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.65%

18.81%

-8.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.67%

17.96%

-7.29%

XCO2.L vs. SP5L.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XCO2.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than SP5L.L's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XCO2.L vs. SP5L.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither XCO2.L nor SP5L.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


XCO2.L and SP5L.L have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SP5L.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SP5L.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for XCO2.L.

XCO2.L is categorized as Global Corporate Bonds, while SP5L.L is S&P 500. XCO2.L tracks Bloomberg Gbl Agg Corp TR USD, while SP5L.L tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for XCO2.L and 0.07% for SP5L.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XCO2.L and SP5L.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer