PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XCNY vs. AVSE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XCNY vs. AVSE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Emerging Markets ex-China ETF (XCNY) and Avantis Responsible Emerging Markets Equity ETF (AVSE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XCNY achieves a 17.77% return, which is significantly lower than AVSE's 19.15% return.


XCNY

1D
-2.01%
1M
-0.00%
6M
13.80%
YTD
17.77%
1Y
29.37%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AVSE

1D
-3.54%
1M
-4.31%
6M
13.54%
YTD
19.15%
1Y
33.90%
3Y*
21.10%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XCNY vs. AVSE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
XCNY
SPDR S&P Emerging Markets ex-China ETF
17.77%20.42%-3.63%
AVSE
Avantis Responsible Emerging Markets Equity ETF
19.15%32.54%-0.48%

Correlation

The correlation between XCNY and AVSE is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 5, 2024

0.87

The correlation between XCNY and AVSE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XCNY vs. AVSE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XCNY
XCNY Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
XCNY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XCNY Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
XCNY Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
XCNY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
XCNY Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

AVSE
AVSE Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
AVSE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVSE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVSE Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
AVSE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVSE Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XCNY vs. AVSE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Emerging Markets ex-China ETF (XCNY) and Avantis Responsible Emerging Markets Equity ETF (AVSE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XCNYAVSEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.28

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.49

2.40

+0.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.05

8.61

+0.44

XCNY vs. AVSE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XCNY Sharpe Ratio is 1.60, which is comparable to the AVSE Sharpe Ratio of 1.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XCNY and AVSE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XCNY vs. AVSE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XCNY drawdown since its inception was -19.70%, smaller than the maximum AVSE drawdown of -26.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XCNY and AVSE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XCNYAVSEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.70%

-26.28%

+6.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.86%

-14.17%

+2.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.60%

-9.07%

+4.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.08%

-6.77%

+2.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.25%

3.95%

-0.70%

Volatility

XCNY vs. AVSE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR S&P Emerging Markets ex-China ETF (XCNY) is 7.75%, while Avantis Responsible Emerging Markets Equity ETF (AVSE) has a volatility of 11.49%. This indicates that XCNY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AVSE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XCNYAVSEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.75%

11.49%

-3.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.81%

21.11%

-4.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.48%

23.14%

-4.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.47%

18.90%

-0.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.47%

18.90%

-0.43%

XCNY vs. AVSE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XCNY has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than AVSE's 0.33% expense ratio.


Dividends

XCNY vs. AVSE - Dividend Comparison

XCNY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.27%, more than AVSE's 2.11% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
AVSE
Avantis Responsible Emerging Markets Equity ETF
2.11%2.68%3.03%3.20%1.27%
XCNY
SPDR S&P Emerging Markets ex-China ETF
2.27%2.68%1.07%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, XCNY and AVSE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

AVSE has higher volatility (11.49%) compared to XCNY (7.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XCNY dropped -19.70% vs AVSE's -26.28%.

On 1-year performance, AVSE leads with 33.90% vs 29.37% for XCNY. On fees, XCNY is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, XCNY has been the lower-risk option at 7.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, AVSE has performed better with a 33.90% return vs 29.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XCNY is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.33% for AVSE.

XCNY has the higher dividend yield at 2.27%, compared with 2.11% for AVSE.

XCNY tracks S&P Emerging ex-China BMI, while AVSE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Avantis. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for XCNY and 0.33% for AVSE.

XCNY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.60 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XCNY and AVSE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer