XCNY vs. ACLO

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

XCNY (SPDR S&P Emerging Markets ex-China ETF) and ACLO (TCW AAA CLO ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XCNY is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund tracking the S&P Emerging ex-China BMI, while ACLO is a CLO fund actively managed by TCW. XCNY is passively managed, while ACLO is actively managed. Over the past year, XCNY returned 41.36% vs 5.31% for ACLO. At a correlation of -0.07, they often move in opposite directions. XCNY charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for ACLO.

Performance

XCNY vs. ACLO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Emerging Markets ex-China ETF (XCNY) and TCW AAA CLO ETF (ACLO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XCNY achieves a 23.45% return, which is significantly higher than ACLO's 2.41% return.

XCNY

• 1D: 0.90%
• 1M: 6.87%
• YTD: 23.45%
• 6M: 24.73%
• 1Y: 41.36%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ACLO

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.41%
• YTD: 2.41%
• 6M: 2.53%
• 1Y: 5.31%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XCNY vs. ACLO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
XCNY SPDR S&P Emerging Markets ex-China ETF	23.45%	20.42%	-0.14%
ACLO TCW AAA CLO ETF	2.41%	5.32%	0.81%

Correlation

The correlation between XCNY and ACLO is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.12
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2024	-0.07

Return for Risk

XCNY vs. ACLO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XCNY

XCNY Risk / Return Rank: 74
XCNY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
XCNY Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
XCNY Omega Ratio Rank: 77
XCNY Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
XCNY Martin Ratio Rank: 72

ACLO

ACLO Risk / Return Rank: 99
ACLO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
ACLO Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
ACLO Omega Ratio Rank: 99
ACLO Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
ACLO Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XCNY vs. ACLO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Emerging Markets ex-China ETF (XCNY) and TCW AAA CLO ETF (ACLO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XCNY	ACLO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.35	7.32	-4.97
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.16	15.16	-11.99
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	3.44	-2.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.50	19.90	-16.40
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.18	165.46	-152.28

XCNY vs. ACLO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XCNY Sharpe Ratio is 2.35, which is lower than the ACLO Sharpe Ratio of 7.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XCNY and ACLO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

XCNY vs. ACLO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XCNY drawdown since its inception was -19.70%, which is greater than ACLO's maximum drawdown of -1.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XCNY and ACLO.

Drawdown Indicators

	XCNY	ACLO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.70%	-1.01%	-18.69%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.86%	-0.27%	-11.59%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.09%	-0.04%	-4.05%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.15%	0.03%	+3.12%

Volatility

XCNY vs. ACLO - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P Emerging Markets ex-China ETF (XCNY) has a higher volatility of 7.61% compared to TCW AAA CLO ETF (ACLO) at 0.19%. This indicates that XCNY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ACLO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XCNY	ACLO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.61%	0.19%	+7.42%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.84%	0.58%	+15.26%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.74%	0.73%	+17.01%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.21%	1.07%	+17.14%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.21%	1.07%	+17.14%

XCNY vs. ACLO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XCNY has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than ACLO's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

XCNY vs. ACLO - Dividend Comparison

XCNY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.99%, less than ACLO's 4.90% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
ACLO TCW AAA CLO ETF	4.90%	4.87%	0.59%
XCNY SPDR S&P Emerging Markets ex-China ETF	2.99%	2.68%	1.07%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XCNY and ACLO in my portfolio?

XCNY and ACLO have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, XCNY or ACLO?

XCNY has higher volatility (7.61%) compared to ACLO (0.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XCNY dropped -19.70% vs ACLO's -1.01%.

Which ETF is better, XCNY or ACLO?

On 1-year performance, XCNY leads with 41.36% vs 5.31% for ACLO. On fees, XCNY is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, ACLO has been the lower-risk option at 0.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, XCNY or ACLO?

Over the 1-year period, XCNY has performed better with a 41.36% return vs 5.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, XCNY or ACLO?

XCNY is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for ACLO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XCNY or ACLO?

ACLO has the higher dividend yield at 4.90%, compared with 2.99% for XCNY.

What is the main difference between XCNY and ACLO?

XCNY is categorized as Emerging Markets Diversified, while ACLO is CLO. They also come from different issuers: State Street and TCW. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for XCNY and 0.20% for ACLO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ACLO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (7.32 vs 2.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.