XCNA.L vs. CHI3.L
XCNA.L (Xtrackers MSCI China A ESG Screened Swap UCITS ETF 1C) and CHI3.L (Leverage Shares 3x Long China ETP Securities) are both China Equities funds. XCNA.L is passively managed, while CHI3.L is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, XCNA.L returned 14.08%/yr vs -15.83%/yr for CHI3.L. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XCNA.L charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for CHI3.L.
Performance
XCNA.L vs. CHI3.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XCNA.L achieves a 9.69% return, which is significantly higher than CHI3.L's -36.01% return.
XCNA.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -2.02%
- 6M
- 7.23%
- YTD
- 9.69%
- 1Y
- 34.84%
- 3Y*
- 14.08%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CHI3.L
- 1D
- 6.48%
- 1M
- -5.40%
- 6M
- -44.40%
- YTD
- -36.01%
- 1Y
- -29.49%
- 3Y*
- -15.83%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XCNA.L vs. CHI3.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XCNA.L Xtrackers MSCI China A ESG Screened Swap UCITS ETF 1C | 9.69% | 32.54% | 14.47% | -12.47% | 11.73% |
CHI3.L Leverage Shares 3x Long China ETP Securities | -36.01% | 50.00% | 6.20% | -53.60% | -46.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between XCNA.L and CHI3.L is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2022 | 0.74 |
The correlation between XCNA.L and CHI3.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XCNA.L vs. CHI3.L — Risk / Return Rank
XCNA.L
CHI3.L
XCNA.L vs. CHI3.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI China A ESG Screened Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XCNA.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Long China ETP Securities (CHI3.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XCNA.L | CHI3.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.35 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.97 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 0.96 | +0.37 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.74 | -0.46 | +5.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.37 | -0.86 | +14.23 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XCNA.L vs. CHI3.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XCNA.L drawdown since its inception was -32.05%, smaller than the maximum CHI3.L drawdown of -84.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XCNA.L and CHI3.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XCNA.L | CHI3.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.05% | -84.75% | +52.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.34% | -63.95% | +56.61% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.66% | -65.83% | +38.17% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.15% | -77.35% | +72.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.98% | -64.92% | +50.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.61% | 34.35% | -31.74% |
Volatility
XCNA.L vs. CHI3.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI China A ESG Screened Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XCNA.L) is 8.24%, while Leverage Shares 3x Long China ETP Securities (CHI3.L) has a volatility of 17.27%. This indicates that XCNA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CHI3.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XCNA.L | CHI3.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.24% | 17.27% | -9.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.15% | 45.76% | -31.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.67% | 61.04% | -42.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.53% | 83.01% | -58.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.53% | 83.01% | -58.48% |
XCNA.L vs. CHI3.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XCNA.L has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than CHI3.L's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
XCNA.L vs. CHI3.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XCNA.L nor CHI3.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XCNA.L and CHI3.L have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XCNA.L is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XCNA.L is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for CHI3.L.
They also come from different issuers: DWS and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for XCNA.L and 0.75% for CHI3.L.
Find the right allocation for XCNA.L and CHI3.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer