PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
XCHP.TO vs. XQQ.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

XCHP.TO vs. XQQ.TO

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Semiconductor Index ETF (XCHP.TO) and iShares NASDAQ 100 Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XQQ.TO).

XCHP.TO and XQQ.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XCHP.TO is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the NYSE Semiconductor Index. It was launched on Sep 6, 2023. XQQ.TO is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Morningstar US Market TR CAD. It was launched on May 3, 2011. Both XCHP.TO and XQQ.TO are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

XCHP.TO vs. XQQ.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares Semiconductor Index ETF (XCHP.TO) and iShares NASDAQ 100 Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XQQ.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

XCHP.TO vs. XQQ.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023
XCHP.TO
iShares Semiconductor Index ETF		10.64%33.58%21.73%15.27%
XQQ.TO
iShares NASDAQ 100 Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)		-6.47%18.38%24.23%8.23%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XCHP.TO achieves a 10.64% return, which is significantly higher than XQQ.TO's -6.47% return.

XCHP.TO

1D
5.96%
1M
-4.67%
YTD
10.64%
6M
21.29%
1Y
70.91%
3Y*
—
5Y*
—
10Y*
—

XQQ.TO

1D
3.44%
1M
-5.05%
YTD
-6.47%
6M
-4.62%
1Y
21.12%
3Y*
20.32%
5Y*
10.45%
10Y*
16.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares Semiconductor Index ETF

iShares NASDAQ 100 Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)

Often compared with XCHP.TO:
XCHP.TO vs. CHPSXCHP.TO vs. SMHXCHP.TO vs. SOXXXCHP.TO vs. TEC.TOXCHP.TO vs. QQC.TOXCHP.TO vs. XMTM.TOXCHP.TO vs. CHPS.TO
Often compared with XQQ.TO:
XQQ.TO vs. QQC.TOXQQ.TO vs. VFV.TOXQQ.TO vs. HXQ.TOXQQ.TO vs. XQQU.TOXQQ.TO vs. QQQXQQ.TO vs. ZQQ.TOXQQ.TO vs. TEC.TO

XCHP.TO vs. XQQ.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both XCHP.TO and XQQ.TO have an expense ratio of 0.39%.

XCHP.TO
iShares Semiconductor Index ETF
XQQ.TO
iShares NASDAQ 100 Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)

Return for Risk

XCHP.TO vs. XQQ.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
XCHP.TO
XCHP.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
XCHP.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XCHP.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
XCHP.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
XCHP.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
XCHP.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
XQQ.TO
XQQ.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
XQQ.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XQQ.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
XQQ.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
XQQ.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
XQQ.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XCHP.TO vs. XQQ.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Semiconductor Index ETF (XCHP.TO) and iShares NASDAQ 100 Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XQQ.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

XCHP.TOXQQ.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.79

0.95

+0.83

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.41

1.50

+0.91

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.21

+0.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.41

1.65

+0.77

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.88

5.80

+3.08

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XCHP.TO vs. XQQ.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XCHP.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.79, which is higher than the XQQ.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XCHP.TO and XQQ.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

XCHP.TOXQQ.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.79

0.95

+0.83

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

—

0.47

—

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

—

0.76

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.98

-1.32

+2.30

Correlation

The correlation between XCHP.TO and XQQ.TO is 0.72, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

XCHP.TO vs. XQQ.TO - Dividend Comparison

XCHP.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.39%, more than XQQ.TO's 0.27% yield.

TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
XCHP.TO
iShares Semiconductor Index ETF		0.39%0.43%0.29%0.17%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XQQ.TO
iShares NASDAQ 100 Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)		0.27%0.25%0.32%0.31%0.43%0.17%0.26%0.46%0.52%0.53%0.76%0.62%

Drawdowns

XCHP.TO vs. XQQ.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XCHP.TO drawdown since its inception was -38.95%, smaller than the maximum XQQ.TO drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XCHP.TO and XQQ.TO.

Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators

XCHP.TOXQQ.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.95%

-100.00%

+61.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.39%

-12.76%

-4.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

—

-38.55%

—

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-38.55%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.11%

-99.98%

+90.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.24%

-99.99%

+90.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.82%

3.63%

+3.19%

Volatility

XCHP.TO vs. XQQ.TO - Volatility Comparison

iShares Semiconductor Index ETF (XCHP.TO) has a higher volatility of 13.40% compared to iShares NASDAQ 100 Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XQQ.TO) at 6.56%. This indicates that XCHP.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XQQ.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period

XCHP.TOXQQ.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.40%

6.56%

+6.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.29%

12.66%

+13.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

40.94%

22.22%

+18.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

38.21%

22.54%

+15.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

38.21%

22.29%

+15.92%