PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XCHP.TO vs. TECH.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

XCHP.TO vs. TECH.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares Semiconductor Index ETF (XCHP.TO) and Evolve FANGMA Index ETF Hedged CAD (TECH.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

XCHP.TO vs. TECH.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
XCHP.TO
iShares Semiconductor Index ETF
10.64%33.58%21.73%15.27%
TECH.TO
Evolve FANGMA Index ETF Hedged CAD
-9.64%18.22%40.26%9.79%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XCHP.TO achieves a 10.64% return, which is significantly higher than TECH.TO's -9.64% return.


XCHP.TO

1D
5.96%
1M
-4.67%
YTD
10.64%
6M
21.29%
1Y
70.91%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TECH.TO

1D
4.00%
1M
-5.31%
YTD
-9.64%
6M
-9.79%
1Y
17.00%
3Y*
27.42%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


XCHP.TO vs. TECH.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XCHP.TO has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than TECH.TO's 0.40% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

XCHP.TO vs. TECH.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XCHP.TO
XCHP.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
XCHP.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XCHP.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
XCHP.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
XCHP.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
XCHP.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

TECH.TO
TECH.TO Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
TECH.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TECH.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
TECH.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
TECH.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
TECH.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XCHP.TO vs. TECH.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Semiconductor Index ETF (XCHP.TO) and Evolve FANGMA Index ETF Hedged CAD (TECH.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XCHP.TOTECH.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.79

0.73

+1.05

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.41

1.28

+1.13

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.16

+0.17

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.41

1.02

+1.39

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.88

3.34

+5.54

XCHP.TO vs. TECH.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XCHP.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.79, which is higher than the TECH.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XCHP.TO and TECH.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XCHP.TOTECH.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.79

0.73

+1.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.98

0.50

+0.49

Correlation

The correlation between XCHP.TO and TECH.TO is 0.45, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

XCHP.TO vs. TECH.TO - Dividend Comparison

XCHP.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.39%, more than TECH.TO's 0.12% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021
XCHP.TO
iShares Semiconductor Index ETF
0.39%0.43%0.29%0.17%0.00%0.00%
TECH.TO
Evolve FANGMA Index ETF Hedged CAD
0.12%0.12%0.14%0.20%0.35%0.17%

Drawdowns

XCHP.TO vs. TECH.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XCHP.TO drawdown since its inception was -38.95%, smaller than the maximum TECH.TO drawdown of -47.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XCHP.TO and TECH.TO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


XCHP.TOTECH.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.95%

-47.92%

+8.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.39%

-16.59%

-0.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.11%

-13.06%

+3.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.24%

-12.66%

+3.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.82%

5.09%

+1.73%

Volatility

XCHP.TO vs. TECH.TO - Volatility Comparison

iShares Semiconductor Index ETF (XCHP.TO) has a higher volatility of 13.40% compared to Evolve FANGMA Index ETF Hedged CAD (TECH.TO) at 6.82%. This indicates that XCHP.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TECH.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


XCHP.TOTECH.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.40%

6.82%

+6.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.29%

13.08%

+13.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

40.94%

23.29%

+17.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

38.21%

26.64%

+11.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

38.21%

26.64%

+11.57%