XCD.TO vs. XEI.TO
XCD.TO (iShares S&P Global Consumer Discretionary Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)) and XEI.TO (iShares S&P/TSX Composite High Dividend Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XCD.TO is a Consumer Discretionary Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Gbl GR CAD, while XEI.TO is a Canada Equities fund tracking the S&P/TSX Composite High Dividend Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XCD.TO returned 9.01%/yr vs 12.32%/yr for XEI.TO. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XCD.TO charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.22%/yr for XEI.TO.
Performance
XCD.TO vs. XEI.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XCD.TO achieves a -4.97% return, which is significantly lower than XEI.TO's 22.21% return. Over the past 10 years, XCD.TO has underperformed XEI.TO with an annualized return of 9.01%, while XEI.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 12.32% annualized return.
XCD.TO
- 1D
- -0.76%
- 1M
- -0.26%
- YTD
- -4.97%
- 6M
- -4.10%
- 1Y
- 4.34%
- 3Y*
- 10.46%
- 5Y*
- 4.13%
- 10Y*
- 9.01%
XEI.TO
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 3.33%
- YTD
- 22.21%
- 6M
- 23.56%
- 1Y
- 43.59%
- 3Y*
- 22.26%
- 5Y*
- 15.55%
- 10Y*
- 12.32%
XCD.TO vs. XEI.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XCD.TO iShares S&P Global Consumer Discretionary Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) | -4.97% | 9.95% | 19.90% | 28.10% | -26.98% | 14.86% | 17.22% | 27.38% | -7.58% | 17.70% |
XEI.TO iShares S&P/TSX Composite High Dividend Index ETF | 22.21% | 25.96% | 15.42% | 6.69% | 0.41% | 35.88% | -7.53% | 25.44% | -10.85% | 7.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between XCD.TO and XEI.TO is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 9, 2013 | 0.36 |
Over the past year, the correlation between XCD.TO and XEI.TO has dropped to 0.14 - well below their long-term average of 0.36, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
XCD.TO vs. XEI.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XCD.TO
XEI.TO
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Communication Services
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Cyclical
XCD.TO
XEI.TO
Technology
XCD.TO
XEI.TO
Consumer Defensive
XCD.TO
XEI.TO
Industrials
XCD.TO
XEI.TO
Communication Services
XCD.TO
XEI.TO
Basic Materials
XCD.TO
-
XEI.TO
Energy
XCD.TO
-
XEI.TO
Financial Services
XCD.TO
-
XEI.TO
Healthcare
XCD.TO
-
XEI.TO
Real Estate
XCD.TO
-
XEI.TO
Utilities
XCD.TO
-
XEI.TO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XCD.TO vs. XEI.TO — Risk / Return Rank
XCD.TO
XEI.TO
XCD.TO vs. XEI.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P Global Consumer Discretionary Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XCD.TO) and iShares S&P/TSX Composite High Dividend Index ETF (XEI.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XCD.TO | XEI.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -5.81 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -8.57 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 2.27 | -1.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.29 | 19.53 | -19.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.85 | 66.28 | -65.43 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XCD.TO | XEI.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 | 6.08 | -5.81 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 | 1.39 | -1.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.43 | 0.77 | -0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.49 | 0.67 | -0.18 |
Drawdowns
XCD.TO vs. XEI.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XCD.TO drawdown since its inception was -39.52%, smaller than the maximum XEI.TO drawdown of -45.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XCD.TO and XEI.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XCD.TO | XEI.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.52% | -45.51% | +5.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.97% | -2.24% | -12.73% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.30% | -9.92% | -9.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.34% | -17.32% | -17.02% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.52% | -45.51% | +5.99% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.18% | -0.76% | -7.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.29% | -5.05% | -2.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.12% | 0.66% | +4.46% |
Volatility
XCD.TO vs. XEI.TO - Volatility Comparison
iShares S&P Global Consumer Discretionary Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XCD.TO) has a higher volatility of 4.97% compared to iShares S&P/TSX Composite High Dividend Index ETF (XEI.TO) at 2.87%. This indicates that XCD.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XEI.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XCD.TO | XEI.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.97% | 2.87% | +2.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.99% | 6.01% | +6.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.55% | 7.21% | +9.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.21% | 11.24% | +8.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.22% | 16.01% | +5.21% |
XCD.TO vs. XEI.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
XCD.TO has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than XEI.TO's 0.22% expense ratio.
Dividends
XCD.TO vs. XEI.TO - Dividend Comparison
XCD.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.00%, more than XEI.TO's 3.56% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XCD.TO iShares S&P Global Consumer Discretionary Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) | 9.00% | 8.55% | 1.29% | 1.14% | 0.71% | 0.37% | 0.40% | 1.07% | 1.32% | 1.13% | 1.33% | 0.96% |
XEI.TO iShares S&P/TSX Composite High Dividend Index ETF | 3.56% | 4.39% | 5.56% | 5.08% | 4.78% | 3.65% | 5.13% | 4.71% | 5.53% | 4.37% | 4.51% | 5.75% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XCD.TO and XEI.TO have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XEI.TO is cheaper at 0.22% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XEI.TO is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for XCD.TO.
XCD.TO is categorized as Consumer Discretionary Equities, while XEI.TO is Canada Equities. XCD.TO tracks Morningstar Gbl GR CAD, while XEI.TO tracks S&P/TSX Composite High Dividend Index. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for XCD.TO and 0.22% for XEI.TO.
Find the right allocation for XCD.TO and XEI.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer