XCB.TO vs. IS.TO
XCB.TO (iShares Core Canadian Corporate Bond Index ETF) is Corporate Bonds fund tracking the Morningstar Can Corp Bd GR CAD, while IS.TO (Infrastructure Dividend Split Corp) is a stock. Over the past 5 years, XCB.TO returned 2.30%/yr vs 6.21%/yr for IS.TO. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
XCB.TO vs. IS.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XCB.TO achieves a 1.75% return, which is significantly lower than IS.TO's 27.44% return.
XCB.TO
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 1.66%
- YTD
- 1.75%
- 6M
- 1.49%
- 1Y
- 4.27%
- 3Y*
- 6.23%
- 5Y*
- 2.30%
- 10Y*
- 2.77%
IS.TO
- 1D
- -0.31%
- 1M
- 2.68%
- YTD
- 27.44%
- 6M
- 25.65%
- 1Y
- 45.10%
- 3Y*
- 18.61%
- 5Y*
- 6.21%
- 10Y*
- —
XCB.TO vs. IS.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XCB.TO iShares Core Canadian Corporate Bond Index ETF | 1.75% | 4.45% | 6.72% | 8.30% | -9.79% | 3.09% |
IS.TO Infrastructure Dividend Split Corp | 27.44% | 19.09% | 17.62% | -11.75% | -12.55% | -6.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between XCB.TO and IS.TO is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 19, 2021 | 0.17 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XCB.TO vs. IS.TO — Risk / Return Rank
XCB.TO
IS.TO
XCB.TO vs. IS.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core Canadian Corporate Bond Index ETF (XCB.TO) and Infrastructure Dividend Split Corp (IS.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XCB.TO | IS.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.59 | -0.39 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.72 | 8.52 | -6.80 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.08 | 24.26 | -19.18 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XCB.TO | IS.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.15 | 3.28 | -2.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 | 0.28 | +0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.39 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.63 | 0.23 | +0.41 |
Drawdowns
XCB.TO vs. IS.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XCB.TO drawdown since its inception was -22.59%, smaller than the maximum IS.TO drawdown of -37.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XCB.TO and IS.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XCB.TO | IS.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.59% | -37.89% | +15.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.49% | -5.32% | +2.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.56% | -18.59% | +15.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.17% | -37.04% | +22.87% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -22.59% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.10% | -0.31% | +0.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.12% | -17.15% | +15.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.84% | 1.86% | -1.02% |
Volatility
XCB.TO vs. IS.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Core Canadian Corporate Bond Index ETF (XCB.TO) is 1.45%, while Infrastructure Dividend Split Corp (IS.TO) has a volatility of 4.59%. This indicates that XCB.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IS.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XCB.TO | IS.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.45% | 4.59% | -3.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.92% | 10.49% | -7.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.74% | 13.83% | -10.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.67% | 22.30% | -16.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.23% | 22.03% | -14.80% |
Dividends
XCB.TO vs. IS.TO - Dividend Comparison
XCB.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.13%, less than IS.TO's 8.84% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IS.TO Infrastructure Dividend Split Corp | 8.84% | 10.57% | 8.69% | 3.60% | 3.07% | 1.74% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XCB.TO iShares Core Canadian Corporate Bond Index ETF | 4.13% | 4.10% | 4.00% | 3.69% | 3.55% | 3.01% | 2.75% | 2.95% | 3.10% | 3.07% | 3.19% | 3.31% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XCB.TO and IS.TO have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for XCB.TO and IS.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer