PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XBTY vs. SPIN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XBTY vs. SPIN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares YieldBOOST Bitcoin ETF (XBTY) and State Street US Equity Premium Income ETF (SPIN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XBTY achieves a -19.17% return, which is significantly lower than SPIN's 3.07% return.


XBTY

1D
-2.23%
1M
-7.49%
YTD
-19.17%
6M
-19.19%
1Y
-35.32%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SPIN

1D
-0.25%
1M
2.78%
YTD
3.07%
6M
3.87%
1Y
20.24%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XBTY vs. SPIN - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between XBTY and SPIN is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 14, 2025

0.41

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XBTY vs. SPIN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XBTY
XBTY Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
XBTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XBTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
XBTY Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
XBTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
XBTY Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

SPIN
SPIN Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
SPIN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPIN Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPIN Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
SPIN Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPIN Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XBTY vs. SPIN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBOOST Bitcoin ETF (XBTY) and State Street US Equity Premium Income ETF (SPIN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XBTYSPINDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-1.25

1.94

-3.19

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-1.78

2.66

-4.44

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.79

1.37

-0.58

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.78

2.08

-2.86

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.20

8.68

-9.88

XBTY vs. SPIN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XBTY Sharpe Ratio is -1.25, which is lower than the SPIN Sharpe Ratio of 1.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XBTY and SPIN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XBTYSPINDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.25

1.94

-3.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-1.25

0.96

-2.21

Drawdowns

XBTY vs. SPIN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XBTY drawdown since its inception was -45.23%, which is greater than SPIN's maximum drawdown of -16.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XBTY and SPIN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XBTYSPINDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.23%

-16.85%

-28.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-45.23%

-9.81%

-35.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-45.23%

-0.25%

-44.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.95%

-2.29%

-20.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

29.35%

2.35%

+27.00%

Volatility

XBTY vs. SPIN - Volatility Comparison

GraniteShares YieldBOOST Bitcoin ETF (XBTY) has a higher volatility of 5.55% compared to State Street US Equity Premium Income ETF (SPIN) at 1.80%. This indicates that XBTY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPIN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XBTYSPINDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.55%

1.80%

+3.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.20%

8.05%

+10.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.34%

10.48%

+17.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.01%

14.34%

+13.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.01%

14.34%

+13.67%

XBTY vs. SPIN - Expense Ratio Comparison

XBTY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than SPIN's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

XBTY vs. SPIN - Dividend Comparison

XBTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 239.89%, more than SPIN's 5.64% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
SPIN
State Street US Equity Premium Income ETF
5.64%8.20%2.36%
XBTY
GraniteShares YieldBOOST Bitcoin ETF
239.89%102.53%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XBTY and SPIN have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XBTY has higher volatility (5.55%) compared to SPIN (1.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XBTY dropped -45.23% vs SPIN's -16.85%.

On 1-year performance, SPIN leads with 20.24% vs -35.32% for XBTY. On fees, SPIN is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, SPIN has been the lower-risk option at 1.80%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SPIN has performed better with a 20.24% return vs -35.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPIN is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for XBTY.

XBTY has the higher dividend yield at 239.89%, compared with 5.64% for SPIN.

They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for XBTY and 0.25% for SPIN.

SPIN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs -1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XBTY and SPIN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer