XBTY vs. OMAH

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

XBTY (GraniteShares YieldBOOST Bitcoin ETF) and OMAH (VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, XBTY returned -39.34% vs 11.47% for OMAH. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XBTY charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for OMAH.

Performance

XBTY vs. OMAH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares YieldBOOST Bitcoin ETF (XBTY) and VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF (OMAH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XBTY achieves a -21.52% return, which is significantly lower than OMAH's 5.30% return.

XBTY

• 1D: -1.11%
• 1M: -7.99%
• YTD: -21.52%
• 6M: -19.82%
• 1Y: -39.34%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

OMAH

• 1D: 0.27%
• 1M: -1.97%
• YTD: 5.30%
• 6M: 5.12%
• 1Y: 11.47%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XBTY vs. OMAH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
XBTY GraniteShares YieldBOOST Bitcoin ETF	-21.52%	-21.19%
OMAH VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF	5.30%	6.21%

Correlation

The correlation between XBTY and OMAH is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.09
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 13, 2025	0.11

Return for Risk

XBTY vs. OMAH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XBTY

XBTY Risk / Return Rank: 1
XBTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 0
XBTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 0
XBTY Omega Ratio Rank: 0
XBTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
XBTY Martin Ratio Rank: 3

OMAH

OMAH Risk / Return Rank: 51
OMAH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
OMAH Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
OMAH Omega Ratio Rank: 40
OMAH Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
OMAH Martin Ratio Rank: 54

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XBTY vs. OMAH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBOOST Bitcoin ETF (XBTY) and VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF (OMAH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XBTY	OMAH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.43	1.44	-2.87
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-2.11	2.01	-4.12
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.75	1.25	-0.50
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.84	3.84	-4.67
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.26	9.13	-10.39

XBTY vs. OMAH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XBTY Sharpe Ratio is -1.43, which is lower than the OMAH Sharpe Ratio of 1.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XBTY and OMAH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

XBTY vs. OMAH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XBTY drawdown since its inception was -47.01%, which is greater than OMAH's maximum drawdown of -11.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XBTY and OMAH.

Drawdown Indicators

	XBTY	OMAH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-47.01%	-11.83%	-35.18%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-47.01%	-3.00%	-44.01%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-46.83%	-1.97%	-44.86%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-24.05%	-1.27%	-22.78%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	31.32%	1.26%	+30.06%

Volatility

XBTY vs. OMAH - Volatility Comparison

GraniteShares YieldBOOST Bitcoin ETF (XBTY) has a higher volatility of 4.95% compared to VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF (OMAH) at 2.21%. This indicates that XBTY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OMAH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XBTY	OMAH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.95%	2.21%	+2.74%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.69%	5.58%	+10.11%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	27.60%	8.04%	+19.56%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	27.41%	13.03%	+14.38%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.41%	13.03%	+14.38%

XBTY vs. OMAH - Expense Ratio Comparison

XBTY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than OMAH's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

XBTY vs. OMAH - Dividend Comparison

XBTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 226.15%, more than OMAH's 14.05% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
OMAH VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF	14.05%	12.86%
XBTY GraniteShares YieldBOOST Bitcoin ETF	226.15%	102.53%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XBTY and OMAH in my portfolio?

XBTY and OMAH have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, XBTY or OMAH?

XBTY has higher volatility (4.95%) compared to OMAH (2.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XBTY dropped -47.01% vs OMAH's -11.83%.

Which ETF is better, XBTY or OMAH?

On 1-year performance, OMAH leads with 11.47% vs -39.34% for XBTY. On fees, OMAH is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, OMAH has been the lower-risk option at 2.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, XBTY or OMAH?

Over the 1-year period, OMAH has performed better with a 11.47% return vs -39.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, XBTY or OMAH?

OMAH is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for XBTY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XBTY or OMAH?

XBTY has the higher dividend yield at 226.15%, compared with 14.05% for OMAH.

What is the main difference between XBTY and OMAH?

They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and VistaShares. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for XBTY and 0.95% for OMAH.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

OMAH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.44 vs -1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.