XBTY vs. MSTY
XBTY (GraniteShares YieldBOOST Bitcoin ETF) and MSTY (YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, XBTY returned -36.52% vs -61.25% for MSTY. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.99% expense ratio.
Performance
XBTY vs. MSTY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XBTY achieves a -19.49% return, which is significantly lower than MSTY's -14.73% return.
XBTY
- 1D
- -0.41%
- 1M
- -8.39%
- YTD
- -19.49%
- 6M
- -20.52%
- 1Y
- -36.52%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MSTY
- 1D
- -6.76%
- 1M
- -28.46%
- YTD
- -14.73%
- 6M
- -26.86%
- 1Y
- -61.25%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XBTY vs. MSTY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XBTY GraniteShares YieldBOOST Bitcoin ETF | -19.49% | -21.15% |
MSTY YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF | -14.73% | -57.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between XBTY and MSTY is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 14, 2025 | 0.76 |
The correlation between XBTY and MSTY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XBTY vs. MSTY — Risk / Return Rank
XBTY
MSTY
XBTY vs. MSTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBOOST Bitcoin ETF (XBTY) and YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (MSTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XBTY | MSTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.29 | -1.02 | -0.28 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.87 | -1.73 | -0.14 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.78 | 0.81 | -0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.81 | -0.86 | +0.05 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.24 | -1.31 | +0.07 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XBTY | MSTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.29 | -1.02 | -0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -1.26 | 0.26 | -1.51 |
Drawdowns
XBTY vs. MSTY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XBTY drawdown since its inception was -45.46%, smaller than the maximum MSTY drawdown of -71.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XBTY and MSTY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XBTY | MSTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.46% | -71.79% | +26.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -45.46% | -71.79% | +26.33% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -45.46% | -66.48% | +21.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.04% | -26.09% | +3.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 29.49% | 46.87% | -17.38% |
Volatility
XBTY vs. MSTY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for GraniteShares YieldBOOST Bitcoin ETF (XBTY) is 5.46%, while YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (MSTY) has a volatility of 17.01%. This indicates that XBTY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSTY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XBTY | MSTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.46% | 17.01% | -11.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.11% | 48.79% | -31.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.34% | 60.44% | -32.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.95% | 71.92% | -43.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.95% | 71.92% | -43.97% |
XBTY vs. MSTY - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both XBTY and MSTY have an expense ratio of 0.99%.
Dividends
XBTY vs. MSTY - Dividend Comparison
XBTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 240.87%, less than MSTY's 269.45% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
MSTY YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF | 269.45% | 294.61% | 104.56% |
XBTY GraniteShares YieldBOOST Bitcoin ETF | 240.87% | 102.53% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XBTY and MSTY have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MSTY has higher volatility (17.01%) compared to XBTY (5.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XBTY dropped -45.46% vs MSTY's -71.79%.
On 1-year performance, XBTY leads with -36.52% vs -61.25% for MSTY. Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. On volatility, XBTY has been the lower-risk option at 5.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, XBTY has performed better with a -36.52% return vs -61.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XBTY and MSTY have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.
MSTY has the higher dividend yield at 269.45%, compared with 240.87% for XBTY.
They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and YieldMax.
MSTY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-1.02 vs -1.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XBTY and MSTY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer