XBTY vs. EGGY
XBTY (GraniteShares YieldBOOST Bitcoin ETF) and EGGY (NestYield Dynamic Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, XBTY returned -45.20% vs 27.10% for EGGY. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XBTY charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for EGGY.
Performance
XBTY vs. EGGY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XBTY achieves a -22.62% return, which is significantly lower than EGGY's 24.40% return.
XBTY
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- -1.98%
- 6M
- -24.61%
- YTD
- -22.62%
- 1Y
- -45.20%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EGGY
- 1D
- -5.34%
- 1M
- -7.20%
- 6M
- 21.46%
- YTD
- 24.40%
- 1Y
- 27.10%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XBTY vs. EGGY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XBTY GraniteShares YieldBOOST Bitcoin ETF | -22.62% | -21.19% |
EGGY NestYield Dynamic Income ETF | 24.40% | 15.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between XBTY and EGGY is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 13, 2025 | 0.38 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XBTY vs. EGGY — Risk / Return Rank
XBTY
EGGY
XBTY vs. EGGY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBOOST Bitcoin ETF (XBTY) and NestYield Dynamic Income ETF (EGGY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XBTY | EGGY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.43 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.71 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.70 | 1.16 | -0.47 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.92 | 1.48 | -2.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.36 | 3.47 | -4.83 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XBTY vs. EGGY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XBTY drawdown since its inception was -49.03%, which is greater than EGGY's maximum drawdown of -18.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XBTY and EGGY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XBTY | EGGY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.03% | -18.34% | -30.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -49.03% | -18.34% | -30.69% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -47.58% | -17.33% | -30.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.12% | -5.40% | -19.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 33.18% | 7.84% | +25.34% |
Volatility
XBTY vs. EGGY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for GraniteShares YieldBOOST Bitcoin ETF (XBTY) is 4.33%, while NestYield Dynamic Income ETF (EGGY) has a volatility of 20.44%. This indicates that XBTY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EGGY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XBTY | EGGY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.33% | 20.44% | -16.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.56% | 31.62% | -16.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.20% | 35.81% | -8.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.99% | 32.66% | -5.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.99% | 32.66% | -5.67% |
XBTY vs. EGGY - Expense Ratio Comparison
XBTY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than EGGY's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
XBTY vs. EGGY - Dividend Comparison
XBTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 211.51%, more than EGGY's 30.41% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
EGGY NestYield Dynamic Income ETF | 30.41% | 28.26% |
XBTY GraniteShares YieldBOOST Bitcoin ETF | 211.51% | 102.53% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XBTY and EGGY have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EGGY has higher volatility (20.44%) compared to XBTY (4.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XBTY dropped -49.03% vs EGGY's -18.34%.
On 1-year performance, EGGY leads with 27.10% vs -45.20% for XBTY. On fees, EGGY is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, XBTY has been the lower-risk option at 4.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, EGGY has performed better with a 27.10% return vs -45.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EGGY is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for XBTY.
XBTY has the higher dividend yield at 211.51%, compared with 30.41% for EGGY.
They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and NestYield. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for XBTY and 0.95% for EGGY.
EGGY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.76 vs -1.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XBTY and EGGY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer