PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XBTY vs. EGGY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XBTY vs. EGGY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares YieldBOOST Bitcoin ETF (XBTY) and NestYield Dynamic Income ETF (EGGY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XBTY achieves a -19.17% return, which is significantly lower than EGGY's 40.45% return.


XBTY

1D
-2.23%
1M
-7.49%
YTD
-19.17%
6M
-19.19%
1Y
-35.32%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

EGGY

1D
4.65%
1M
18.68%
YTD
40.45%
6M
39.14%
1Y
54.91%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XBTY vs. EGGY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
XBTY
GraniteShares YieldBOOST Bitcoin ETF
-19.17%-21.15%
EGGY
NestYield Dynamic Income ETF
40.45%13.48%

Correlation

The correlation between XBTY and EGGY is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 14, 2025

0.40

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XBTY vs. EGGY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XBTY
XBTY Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
XBTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XBTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
XBTY Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
XBTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
XBTY Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

EGGY
EGGY Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
EGGY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EGGY Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
EGGY Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
EGGY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
EGGY Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XBTY vs. EGGY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBOOST Bitcoin ETF (XBTY) and NestYield Dynamic Income ETF (EGGY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XBTYEGGYDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-1.25

1.90

-3.15

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-1.78

2.32

-4.10

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.79

1.34

-0.55

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.78

3.06

-3.84

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.20

7.74

-8.94

XBTY vs. EGGY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XBTY Sharpe Ratio is -1.25, which is lower than the EGGY Sharpe Ratio of 1.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XBTY and EGGY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XBTYEGGYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.25

1.90

-3.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-1.25

1.41

-2.66

Drawdowns

XBTY vs. EGGY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XBTY drawdown since its inception was -45.23%, which is greater than EGGY's maximum drawdown of -18.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XBTY and EGGY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XBTYEGGYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.23%

-18.34%

-26.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-45.23%

-18.34%

-26.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-45.23%

0.00%

-45.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.95%

-5.26%

-17.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

29.35%

7.26%

+22.09%

Volatility

XBTY vs. EGGY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for GraniteShares YieldBOOST Bitcoin ETF (XBTY) is 5.55%, while NestYield Dynamic Income ETF (EGGY) has a volatility of 12.46%. This indicates that XBTY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EGGY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XBTYEGGYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.55%

12.46%

-6.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.20%

23.89%

-5.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.34%

29.04%

-0.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.01%

28.65%

-0.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.01%

28.65%

-0.64%

XBTY vs. EGGY - Expense Ratio Comparison

XBTY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than EGGY's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

XBTY vs. EGGY - Dividend Comparison

XBTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 239.89%, more than EGGY's 25.40% yield.


PositionTTM2025
EGGY
NestYield Dynamic Income ETF
25.40%28.26%
XBTY
GraniteShares YieldBOOST Bitcoin ETF
239.89%102.53%

Frequently Asked Questions


XBTY and EGGY have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EGGY has higher volatility (12.46%) compared to XBTY (5.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XBTY dropped -45.23% vs EGGY's -18.34%.

On 1-year performance, EGGY leads with 54.91% vs -35.32% for XBTY. On fees, EGGY is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, XBTY has been the lower-risk option at 5.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, EGGY has performed better with a 54.91% return vs -35.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EGGY is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for XBTY.

XBTY has the higher dividend yield at 239.89%, compared with 25.40% for EGGY.

They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and NestYield. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for XBTY and 0.95% for EGGY.

EGGY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs -1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XBTY and EGGY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer