XBTY vs. ARMW
XBTY (GraniteShares YieldBOOST Bitcoin ETF) and ARMW (Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.33 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. Both charge a 0.99% expense ratio.
Performance
XBTY vs. ARMW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XBTY achieves a -22.50% return, which is significantly lower than ARMW's 134.95% return.
XBTY
- 1D
- -0.77%
- 1M
- 1.12%
- 6M
- -16.67%
- YTD
- -22.50%
- 1Y
- -44.39%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -33.34%
ARMW
- 1D
- -1.33%
- 1M
- -28.55%
- 6M
- 146.99%
- YTD
- 134.95%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $3.87M | $4.86M | $4.12M | |
| $70.68K | $100.72K | $240.24K |
XBTY vs. ARMW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XBTY GraniteShares YieldBOOST Bitcoin ETF | -22.50% | -15.58% |
ARMW Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF | 134.95% | -41.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between XBTY and ARMW is 0.33, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2025 | 0.33 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XBTY vs. ARMW — Risk / Return Rank
XBTY
ARMW
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
XBTY vs. ARMW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBOOST Bitcoin ETF (XBTY) and Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF (ARMW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XBTY | ARMW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.68 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.97 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.35 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XBTY vs. ARMW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XBTY drawdown since its inception was -49.03%, smaller than the maximum ARMW drawdown of -56.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XBTY and ARMW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XBTY | ARMW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.03% | -56.50% | +7.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -49.03% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -47.49% | -52.71% | +5.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.13% | -27.18% | +1.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 34.99% | — | — |
Volatility
XBTY vs. ARMW - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XBTY | ARMW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.14% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.90% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.92% | 96.03% | -69.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.42% | 96.03% | -69.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.42% | 96.03% | -69.61% |
XBTY vs. ARMW - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both XBTY and ARMW have an expense ratio of 0.99%.
Dividends
XBTY vs. ARMW - Dividend Comparison
XBTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 201.11%, more than ARMW's 62.70% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
ARMW Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF | 62.70% | 16.38% |
XBTY GraniteShares YieldBOOST Bitcoin ETF | 192.49% | 102.53% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XBTY and ARMW have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XBTY and ARMW have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.
XBTY has the higher dividend yield at 192.49%, compared with 62.70% for ARMW.
They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Roundhill.
Find the right allocation for XBTY and ARMW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer