PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XBO2.DE vs. PR1G.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XBO2.DE vs. PR1G.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers II Italy Government Bond 0-1 Swap UCITS ETF (Acc) (XBO2.DE) and Amundi Prime Global Government Bond UCITS ETF (Dist) (PR1G.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XBO2.DE achieves a 0.65% return, which is significantly lower than PR1G.DE's 0.99% return.


XBO2.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
0.15%
6M
0.86%
YTD
0.65%
1Y
1.73%
3Y*
2.81%
5Y*
1.73%
10Y*
0.71%

PR1G.DE

1D
0.18%
1M
0.18%
6M
0.24%
YTD
0.99%
1Y
1.22%
3Y*
0.44%
5Y*
-2.72%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XBO2.DE vs. PR1G.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
XBO2.DE
Xtrackers II Italy Government Bond 0-1 Swap UCITS ETF (Acc)
0.65%2.42%3.53%3.03%-0.64%-0.60%-0.22%-0.13%
PR1G.DE
Amundi Prime Global Government Bond UCITS ETF (Dist)
0.99%-4.74%2.19%1.15%-13.10%0.82%0.44%7.03%

Correlation

The correlation between XBO2.DE and PR1G.DE is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.12

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 5, 2019

0.15

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XBO2.DE vs. PR1G.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XBO2.DE
XBO2.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
XBO2.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XBO2.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
XBO2.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
XBO2.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
XBO2.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

PR1G.DE
PR1G.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
PR1G.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PR1G.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
PR1G.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
PR1G.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
PR1G.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XBO2.DE vs. PR1G.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers II Italy Government Bond 0-1 Swap UCITS ETF (Acc) (XBO2.DE) and Amundi Prime Global Government Bond UCITS ETF (Dist) (PR1G.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XBO2.DEPR1G.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.06

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.54

0.43

+1.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.21

0.87

+3.34

XBO2.DE vs. PR1G.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XBO2.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.52, which is higher than the PR1G.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XBO2.DE and PR1G.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XBO2.DE vs. PR1G.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XBO2.DE drawdown since its inception was -3.92%, smaller than the maximum PR1G.DE drawdown of -20.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XBO2.DE and PR1G.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XBO2.DEPR1G.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.92%

-20.86%

+16.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.12%

-2.85%

+1.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.12%

-7.94%

+6.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-1.31%

-17.71%

+16.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-3.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.58%

-18.36%

+17.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.71%

-11.48%

+10.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.41%

1.39%

-0.98%

Volatility

XBO2.DE vs. PR1G.DE - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers II Italy Government Bond 0-1 Swap UCITS ETF (Acc) (XBO2.DE) has a higher volatility of 1.48% compared to Amundi Prime Global Government Bond UCITS ETF (Dist) (PR1G.DE) at 1.17%. This indicates that XBO2.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PR1G.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XBO2.DEPR1G.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.48%

1.17%

+0.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.61%

3.01%

-0.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.29%

4.05%

-0.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.53%

6.47%

-4.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.64%

6.10%

-4.46%

XBO2.DE vs. PR1G.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XBO2.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than PR1G.DE's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XBO2.DE vs. PR1G.DE - Dividend Comparison

XBO2.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PR1G.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.93%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
PR1G.DE
Amundi Prime Global Government Bond UCITS ETF (Dist)
2.93%2.96%2.34%1.99%1.74%1.50%1.77%1.23%
XBO2.DE
Xtrackers II Italy Government Bond 0-1 Swap UCITS ETF (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XBO2.DE and PR1G.DE have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, PR1G.DE is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PR1G.DE is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for XBO2.DE.

XBO2.DE tracks FTSE Eurozone BOT Index, while PR1G.DE tracks Solactive Global Developed Government Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for XBO2.DE and 0.05% for PR1G.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XBO2.DE and PR1G.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer