PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XBO2.DE vs. DBXG.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XBO2.DE vs. DBXG.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers II Italy Government Bond 0-1 Swap UCITS ETF (Acc) (XBO2.DE) and Xtrackers II Eurozone Government Bond 25+ UCITS ETF (Acc) (DBXG.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XBO2.DE achieves a 0.65% return, which is significantly higher than DBXG.DE's -1.04% return. Over the past 10 years, XBO2.DE has outperformed DBXG.DE with an annualized return of 0.71%, while DBXG.DE has yielded a comparatively lower -3.98% annualized return.


XBO2.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
0.15%
6M
0.86%
YTD
0.65%
1Y
1.73%
3Y*
2.81%
5Y*
1.73%
10Y*
0.71%

DBXG.DE

1D
0.38%
1M
-3.32%
6M
-2.41%
YTD
-1.04%
1Y
-2.98%
3Y*
-3.12%
5Y*
-11.38%
10Y*
-3.98%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XBO2.DE vs. DBXG.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XBO2.DE
Xtrackers II Italy Government Bond 0-1 Swap UCITS ETF (Acc)
0.65%2.42%3.53%3.03%-0.64%-0.60%-0.22%0.03%-0.47%-0.44%
DBXG.DE
Xtrackers II Eurozone Government Bond 25+ UCITS ETF (Acc)
-1.04%-9.41%-3.96%9.47%-40.42%-9.69%16.29%21.12%4.90%-2.36%

Correlation

The correlation between XBO2.DE and DBXG.DE is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.12

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2012

0.14

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XBO2.DE vs. DBXG.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XBO2.DE
XBO2.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
XBO2.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XBO2.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
XBO2.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
XBO2.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
XBO2.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

DBXG.DE
DBXG.DE Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
DBXG.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBXG.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBXG.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
DBXG.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBXG.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XBO2.DE vs. DBXG.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers II Italy Government Bond 0-1 Swap UCITS ETF (Acc) (XBO2.DE) and Xtrackers II Eurozone Government Bond 25+ UCITS ETF (Acc) (DBXG.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XBO2.DEDBXG.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.79

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

0.97

+0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.54

-0.44

+1.98

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.21

-0.83

+5.05

XBO2.DE vs. DBXG.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XBO2.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.52, which is higher than the DBXG.DE Sharpe Ratio of -0.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XBO2.DE and DBXG.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XBO2.DE vs. DBXG.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XBO2.DE drawdown since its inception was -3.92%, smaller than the maximum DBXG.DE drawdown of -53.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XBO2.DE and DBXG.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XBO2.DEDBXG.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.92%

-53.51%

+49.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.12%

-6.77%

+5.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.12%

-17.62%

+16.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-1.31%

-51.05%

+49.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-3.77%

-53.51%

+49.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.58%

-49.94%

+49.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.71%

-16.12%

+15.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.41%

3.57%

-3.16%

Volatility

XBO2.DE vs. DBXG.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers II Italy Government Bond 0-1 Swap UCITS ETF (Acc) (XBO2.DE) is 1.48%, while Xtrackers II Eurozone Government Bond 25+ UCITS ETF (Acc) (DBXG.DE) has a volatility of 2.97%. This indicates that XBO2.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBXG.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XBO2.DEDBXG.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.48%

2.97%

-1.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.61%

8.37%

-5.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.29%

11.10%

-7.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.53%

17.72%

-16.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.64%

15.16%

-13.52%

XBO2.DE vs. DBXG.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both XBO2.DE and DBXG.DE have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XBO2.DE vs. DBXG.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither XBO2.DE nor DBXG.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


XBO2.DE and DBXG.DE have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.15% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XBO2.DE and DBXG.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.15% per year.

XBO2.DE tracks FTSE Eurozone BOT Index, while DBXG.DE tracks iBoxx EUR Eurozone 25+ Index.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XBO2.DE and DBXG.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer