PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XBM.TO vs. XAD.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XBM.TO vs. XAD.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares S&P/TSX Global Base Metals Index ETF (XBM.TO) and iShares U.S. Aerospace & Defense Index ETF (XAD.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XBM.TO achieves a 31.10% return, which is significantly higher than XAD.TO's 11.18% return.


XBM.TO

1D
2.73%
1M
6.67%
YTD
31.10%
6M
38.65%
1Y
104.78%
3Y*
26.59%
5Y*
17.84%
10Y*
19.65%

XAD.TO

1D
-0.47%
1M
9.47%
YTD
11.18%
6M
13.68%
1Y
34.40%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XBM.TO vs. XAD.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
XBM.TO
iShares S&P/TSX Global Base Metals Index ETF
31.10%50.69%5.96%-3.86%
XAD.TO
iShares U.S. Aerospace & Defense Index ETF
11.18%41.77%25.00%13.86%

Correlation

The correlation between XBM.TO and XAD.TO is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 19, 2023

0.19

The correlation between XBM.TO and XAD.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.19 (all time) to 0.31 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XBM.TO vs. XAD.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XBM.TO
XBM.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
XBM.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XBM.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
XBM.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
XBM.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
XBM.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

XAD.TO
XAD.TO Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
XAD.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XAD.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
XAD.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
XAD.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
XAD.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XBM.TO vs. XAD.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P/TSX Global Base Metals Index ETF (XBM.TO) and iShares U.S. Aerospace & Defense Index ETF (XAD.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XBM.TOXAD.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.67

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.28

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.35

2.34

+2.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.08

5.89

+10.18

XBM.TO vs. XAD.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XBM.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.76, which is higher than the XAD.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XBM.TO and XAD.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XBM.TO vs. XAD.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XBM.TO drawdown since its inception was -67.53%, which is greater than XAD.TO's maximum drawdown of -16.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XBM.TO and XAD.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XBM.TOXAD.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.53%

-16.06%

-51.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.88%

-14.91%

-8.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-37.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-57.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.34%

-4.29%

-4.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-26.09%

-2.90%

-23.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.46%

5.91%

+0.55%

Volatility

XBM.TO vs. XAD.TO - Volatility Comparison

iShares S&P/TSX Global Base Metals Index ETF (XBM.TO) has a higher volatility of 17.03% compared to iShares U.S. Aerospace & Defense Index ETF (XAD.TO) at 7.54%. This indicates that XBM.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XAD.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XBM.TOXAD.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.03%

7.54%

+9.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

32.15%

17.69%

+14.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

37.63%

21.24%

+16.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.55%

19.92%

+13.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.88%

19.92%

+12.96%

XBM.TO vs. XAD.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XBM.TO has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than XAD.TO's 0.44% expense ratio.


Dividends

XBM.TO vs. XAD.TO - Dividend Comparison

XBM.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.65%, more than XAD.TO's 0.32% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
XAD.TO
iShares U.S. Aerospace & Defense Index ETF
0.32%0.35%0.44%0.24%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XBM.TO
iShares S&P/TSX Global Base Metals Index ETF
0.65%0.86%1.25%2.09%4.78%3.05%1.81%3.73%3.38%1.65%2.41%5.75%

Frequently Asked Questions


XBM.TO and XAD.TO have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XAD.TO is cheaper at 0.44% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XAD.TO is cheaper with a 0.44% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for XBM.TO.

XBM.TO is categorized as Energy Equities, while XAD.TO is Aerospace & Defense. XBM.TO tracks Morningstar Can Natural Resource NR CAD, while XAD.TO tracks Dow Jones U.S. Select Aerospace & Defense Index. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for XBM.TO and 0.44% for XAD.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XBM.TO and XAD.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer