PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
XBM.TO vs. EMAX.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

XBM.TO vs. EMAX.TO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

XBM.TO (iShares S&P/TSX Global Base Metals Index ETF) and EMAX.TO (Hamilton Energy YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF) are both Energy Equities funds. XBM.TO is passively managed, while EMAX.TO is actively managed. Over the past year, XBM.TO returned 119.30% vs 48.14% for EMAX.TO. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XBM.TO charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for EMAX.TO.

Performance

XBM.TO vs. EMAX.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares S&P/TSX Global Base Metals Index ETF (XBM.TO) and Hamilton Energy YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (EMAX.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XBM.TO achieves a 38.48% return, which is significantly higher than EMAX.TO's 30.76% return.

XBM.TO

1D
-3.17%
1M
21.23%
YTD
38.48%
6M
46.72%
1Y
119.30%
3Y*
29.93%
5Y*
19.70%
10Y*
20.17%

EMAX.TO

1D
1.73%
1M
0.51%
YTD
30.76%
6M
24.14%
1Y
48.14%
3Y*
—
5Y*
—
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XBM.TO vs. EMAX.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)20252024
XBM.TO
iShares S&P/TSX Global Base Metals Index ETF		38.48%50.69%13.84%
EMAX.TO
Hamilton Energy YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF		30.76%4.63%3.60%

Correlation

The correlation between XBM.TO and EMAX.TO is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 8, 2024

0.19

The correlation between XBM.TO and EMAX.TO shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (1 year) to 0.19 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XBM.TO vs. EMAX.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
XBM.TO
EMAX.TO

Basic Materials

99.8%

-

Industrials

0.2%

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

100.0%

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Basic Materials

XBM.TO
99.8%
EMAX.TO

-

Industrials

XBM.TO
0.2%
EMAX.TO

-

Communication Services

XBM.TO

-

EMAX.TO

-

Consumer Cyclical

XBM.TO

-

EMAX.TO

-

Consumer Defensive

XBM.TO

-

EMAX.TO

-

Energy

XBM.TO

-

EMAX.TO
100.0%

Financial Services

XBM.TO

-

EMAX.TO

-

Healthcare

XBM.TO

-

EMAX.TO

-

Real Estate

XBM.TO

-

EMAX.TO

-

Technology

XBM.TO

-

EMAX.TO

-

Utilities

XBM.TO

-

EMAX.TO

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares S&P/TSX Global Base Metals Index ETF

Hamilton Energy YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF

Often compared with XBM.TO:
XBM.TO vs. XMEXBM.TO vs. ZMT.TOXBM.TO vs. XEG.TOXBM.TO vs. XETM.TOXBM.TO vs. GDXXBM.TO vs. VDEXBM.TO vs. XMA.TO
Often compared with EMAX.TO:
EMAX.TO vs. ENCC.TOEMAX.TO vs. HDIV.TOEMAX.TO vs. QMAX.TOEMAX.TO vs. HMAX.TOEMAX.TO vs. UMAX.TOEMAX.TO vs. XEG.TOEMAX.TO vs. GLCC.TO

Return for Risk

XBM.TO vs. EMAX.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
XBM.TO
XBM.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
XBM.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XBM.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
XBM.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
XBM.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
XBM.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
EMAX.TO
EMAX.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
EMAX.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMAX.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMAX.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
EMAX.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMAX.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XBM.TO vs. EMAX.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P/TSX Global Base Metals Index ETF (XBM.TO) and Hamilton Energy YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (EMAX.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

XBM.TOEMAX.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
3.37
2.42

+0.95

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
3.67
3.13

+0.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.39

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.02

3.90

+1.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.44

12.55

+6.89

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XBM.TO vs. EMAX.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XBM.TO Sharpe Ratio is 3.37, which is higher than the EMAX.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XBM.TO and EMAX.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

XBM.TOEMAX.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.37

2.42

+0.95

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.25

0.73

-0.48

Drawdowns

XBM.TO vs. EMAX.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XBM.TO drawdown since its inception was -67.40%, which is greater than EMAX.TO's maximum drawdown of -27.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XBM.TO and EMAX.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

XBM.TOEMAX.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.40%

-27.55%

-39.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.88%

-12.39%

-11.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-37.45%

—

—

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.57%

—

—

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-57.24%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.17%

-3.72%

+0.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.80%

-9.31%

-16.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.16%

3.85%

+2.31%

Volatility

XBM.TO vs. EMAX.TO - Volatility Comparison

iShares S&P/TSX Global Base Metals Index ETF (XBM.TO) has a higher volatility of 13.03% compared to Hamilton Energy YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (EMAX.TO) at 7.47%. This indicates that XBM.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EMAX.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

XBM.TOEMAX.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.03%

7.47%

+5.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

29.68%

15.32%

+14.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

35.62%

20.03%

+15.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.06%

22.41%

+10.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.66%

22.41%

+10.25%

XBM.TO vs. EMAX.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XBM.TO has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than EMAX.TO's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

XBM.TO vs. EMAX.TO - Dividend Comparison

XBM.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%, less than EMAX.TO's 10.25% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EMAX.TO
Hamilton Energy YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF		10.25%13.44%12.31%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XBM.TO
iShares S&P/TSX Global Base Metals Index ETF		0.62%0.86%1.25%2.09%4.83%3.01%1.81%3.71%3.43%1.63%2.42%5.70%

Frequently Asked Questions

XBM.TO and EMAX.TO have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XBM.TO is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XBM.TO is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for EMAX.TO.

They also come from different issuers: iShares and Hamilton Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for XBM.TO and 0.65% for EMAX.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XBM.TO and EMAX.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer