XBJL vs. SFLR

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

XBJL (Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - July) and SFLR (Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XBJL is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by Innovator, while SFLR is a Options Trading fund actively managed by Innovator. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, XBJL returned 11.72%/yr vs 16.02%/yr for SFLR. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XBJL charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for SFLR.

Performance

XBJL vs. SFLR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - July (XBJL) and Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF (SFLR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XBJL achieves a 4.17% return, which is significantly lower than SFLR's 5.55% return.

XBJL

• 1D: 0.01%
• 1M: 1.01%
• YTD: 4.17%
• 6M: 5.05%
• 1Y: 12.17%
• 3Y*: 11.72%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SFLR

• 1D: -0.38%
• 1M: 5.11%
• YTD: 5.55%
• 6M: 5.78%
• 1Y: 19.44%
• 3Y*: 16.02%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XBJL vs. SFLR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
XBJL Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - July	4.17%	12.05%	11.50%	19.49%	2.87%
SFLR Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF	5.55%	13.29%	19.99%	21.20%	1.38%

Correlation

The correlation between XBJL and SFLR is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.83
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.81
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2022	0.84

The correlation between XBJL and SFLR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

XBJL vs. SFLR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XBJL	SFLR
Technology	36.2%	35.5%
Financial Services	11.9%	11.3%
Communication Services	10.9%	11.7%
Consumer Cyclical	10.1%	10.0%
Healthcare	8.4%	8.5%
Industrials	8.1%	8.4%
Consumer Defensive	4.9%	4.8%
Energy	3.5%	3.7%
Utilities	2.3%	2.5%
Real Estate	1.9%	1.6%
Basic Materials	1.8%	2.1%

Return for Risk

XBJL vs. SFLR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XBJL

XBJL Risk / Return Rank: 82
XBJL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
XBJL Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
XBJL Omega Ratio Rank: 87
XBJL Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
XBJL Martin Ratio Rank: 90

SFLR

SFLR Risk / Return Rank: 64
SFLR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
SFLR Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
SFLR Omega Ratio Rank: 69
SFLR Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
SFLR Martin Ratio Rank: 64

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XBJL vs. SFLR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - July (XBJL) and Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF (SFLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XBJL	SFLR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.41	2.20	+0.22
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.71	2.98	+0.73
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.53	1.42	+0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.70	2.87	+0.82
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	20.85	11.73	+9.12
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XBJL vs. SFLR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XBJL Sharpe Ratio is 2.41, which is comparable to the SFLR Sharpe Ratio of 2.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XBJL and SFLR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XBJL	SFLR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.41	2.20	+0.22
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.93	1.71	-0.78

Drawdowns

XBJL vs. SFLR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XBJL drawdown since its inception was -11.78%, roughly equal to the maximum SFLR drawdown of -12.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XBJL and SFLR.

Drawdown Indicators

	XBJL	SFLR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-11.78%	-12.13%	+0.35%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.30%	-6.79%	+3.49%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-11.74%	-12.13%	+0.39%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.38%	+0.38%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.63%	-1.74%	+0.11%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.58%	1.66%	-1.08%

Volatility

XBJL vs. SFLR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - July (XBJL) is 0.32%, while Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF (SFLR) has a volatility of 1.87%. This indicates that XBJL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SFLR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XBJL	SFLR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.32%	1.87%	-1.55%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.72%	6.46%	-2.74%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.08%	8.89%	-3.81%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.99%	10.15%	-0.16%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.99%	10.15%	-0.16%

XBJL vs. SFLR - Expense Ratio Comparison

XBJL has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than SFLR's 0.89% expense ratio.

Dividends

XBJL vs. SFLR - Dividend Comparison

XBJL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SFLR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.32%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
SFLR Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF	0.32%	0.33%	0.42%	1.16%	0.06%
XBJL Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - July	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XBJL and SFLR in my portfolio?

XBJL and SFLR have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, XBJL or SFLR?

SFLR has higher volatility (1.87%) compared to XBJL (0.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XBJL dropped -11.78% vs SFLR's -12.13%.

Which ETF is better, XBJL or SFLR?

On 3-year performance, SFLR leads with 16.02% vs 11.72% for XBJL. On fees, XBJL is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, XBJL has been the lower-risk option at 0.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, XBJL or SFLR?

Over the 3-year period, SFLR has performed better with a 16.02% return vs 11.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, XBJL or SFLR?

XBJL is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for SFLR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XBJL or SFLR?

SFLR has the higher dividend yield at 0.32%, compared with 0.00% for XBJL.

What is the main difference between XBJL and SFLR?

XBJL is categorized as Defined Outcome, while SFLR is Options Trading. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for XBJL and 0.89% for SFLR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XBJL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 2.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.