XBJL vs. PQAP

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

XBJL (Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - July) and PQAP (PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - April) are both Defined Outcome funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, XBJL returned 11.32% vs 19.07% for PQAP. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XBJL charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for PQAP.

Performance

XBJL vs. PQAP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - July (XBJL) and PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - April (PQAP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XBJL achieves a 4.39% return, which is significantly lower than PQAP's 10.67% return.

XBJL

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.54%
• YTD: 4.39%
• 6M: 4.36%
• 1Y: 11.32%
• 3Y*: 11.49%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PQAP

• 1D: -0.96%
• 1M: -0.66%
• YTD: 10.67%
• 6M: 10.77%
• 1Y: 19.07%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XBJL vs. PQAP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
XBJL Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - July	4.39%	12.05%
PQAP PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - April	10.67%	14.48%

Correlation

The correlation between XBJL and PQAP is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.78
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2025	0.82

The correlation between XBJL and PQAP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

XBJL vs. PQAP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XBJL

XBJL Risk / Return Rank: 83
XBJL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
XBJL Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
XBJL Omega Ratio Rank: 89
XBJL Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
XBJL Martin Ratio Rank: 91

PQAP

PQAP Risk / Return Rank: 97
PQAP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
PQAP Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
PQAP Omega Ratio Rank: 97
PQAP Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
PQAP Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XBJL vs. PQAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - July (XBJL) and PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - April (PQAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XBJL	PQAP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.26	3.86	-1.61
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.47	6.02	-2.55
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.50	1.92	-0.42
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.44	8.93	-5.49
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	19.40	54.70	-35.31

XBJL vs. PQAP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XBJL Sharpe Ratio is 2.26, which is lower than the PQAP Sharpe Ratio of 3.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XBJL and PQAP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

XBJL vs. PQAP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XBJL drawdown since its inception was -11.78%, which is greater than PQAP's maximum drawdown of -10.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XBJL and PQAP.

Drawdown Indicators

	XBJL	PQAP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-11.78%	-10.79%	-0.99%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.30%	-2.15%	-1.15%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-11.74%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-1.39%	+1.39%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.62%	-0.61%	-1.01%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.58%	0.35%	+0.23%

Volatility

XBJL vs. PQAP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - July (XBJL) is 0.30%, while PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - April (PQAP) has a volatility of 2.63%. This indicates that XBJL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PQAP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XBJL	PQAP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.30%	2.63%	-2.33%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.66%	3.99%	-0.33%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.04%	4.99%	+0.05%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.94%	11.03%	-1.09%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.94%	11.03%	-1.09%

XBJL vs. PQAP - Expense Ratio Comparison

XBJL has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than PQAP's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

XBJL vs. PQAP - Dividend Comparison

XBJL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PQAP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%.

Position	TTM	2025
PQAP PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - April	0.02%	0.02%
XBJL Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - July	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XBJL and PQAP in my portfolio?

XBJL and PQAP have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, XBJL or PQAP?

PQAP has higher volatility (2.63%) compared to XBJL (0.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XBJL dropped -11.78% vs PQAP's -10.79%.

Which ETF is better, XBJL or PQAP?

On 1-year performance, PQAP leads with 19.07% vs 11.32% for XBJL. On fees, PQAP is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, XBJL has been the lower-risk option at 0.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, XBJL or PQAP?

Over the 1-year period, PQAP has performed better with a 19.07% return vs 11.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, XBJL or PQAP?

PQAP is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for XBJL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XBJL or PQAP?

PQAP has the higher dividend yield at 0.02%, compared with 0.00% for XBJL.

What is the main difference between XBJL and PQAP?

They also come from different issuers: Innovator and PGIM. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for XBJL and 0.50% for PQAP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PQAP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.86 vs 2.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.