XBJL vs. MMAX
XBJL (Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - July) and MMAX (iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Mar ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, XBJL returned 12.17% vs 7.67% for MMAX. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XBJL charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for MMAX.
Performance
XBJL vs. MMAX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XBJL achieves a 4.17% return, which is significantly higher than MMAX's 3.09% return.
XBJL
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 1.01%
- YTD
- 4.17%
- 6M
- 5.05%
- 1Y
- 12.17%
- 3Y*
- 11.72%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MMAX
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- 0.60%
- YTD
- 3.09%
- 6M
- 3.75%
- 1Y
- 7.67%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XBJL vs. MMAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XBJL Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - July | 4.17% | 12.63% |
MMAX iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Mar ETF | 3.09% | 5.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between XBJL and MMAX is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2025 | 0.64 |
The correlation between XBJL and MMAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XBJL vs. MMAX — Risk / Return Rank
XBJL
MMAX
XBJL vs. MMAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - July (XBJL) and iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Mar ETF (MMAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XBJL | MMAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -6.86 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.53 | 2.51 | -0.98 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.70 | 22.49 | -18.79 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.85 | 112.49 | -91.63 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XBJL | MMAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.41 | 5.52 | -3.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.93 | 3.13 | -2.20 |
Drawdowns
XBJL vs. MMAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XBJL drawdown since its inception was -11.78%, which is greater than MMAX's maximum drawdown of -1.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XBJL and MMAX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XBJL | MMAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.78% | -1.93% | -9.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.30% | -0.34% | -2.96% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.74% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.13% | +0.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.63% | -0.10% | -1.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.58% | 0.07% | +0.51% |
Volatility
XBJL vs. MMAX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - July (XBJL) is 0.32%, while iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Mar ETF (MMAX) has a volatility of 0.36%. This indicates that XBJL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MMAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XBJL | MMAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.32% | 0.36% | -0.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.72% | 0.96% | +2.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.08% | 1.39% | +3.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.99% | 2.49% | +7.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.99% | 2.49% | +7.50% |
XBJL vs. MMAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
XBJL has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than MMAX's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
XBJL vs. MMAX - Dividend Comparison
XBJL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MMAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.27%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
MMAX iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Mar ETF | 1.27% | 1.31% |
XBJL Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - July | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XBJL and MMAX have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MMAX has higher volatility (0.36%) compared to XBJL (0.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XBJL dropped -11.78% vs MMAX's -1.93%.
On 1-year performance, XBJL leads with 12.17% vs 7.67% for MMAX. On fees, MMAX is cheaper at 0.50% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, XBJL has performed better with a 12.17% return vs 7.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MMAX is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for XBJL.
MMAX has the higher dividend yield at 1.27%, compared with 0.00% for XBJL.
They also come from different issuers: Innovator and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for XBJL and 0.50% for MMAX.
MMAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.52 vs 2.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XBJL and MMAX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer