XBJL vs. IBID

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

XBJL (Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - July) and IBID (iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XBJL is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by Innovator, while IBID is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the ICE 2027 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index. XBJL is actively managed, while IBID is passively managed. Over the past year, XBJL returned 11.62% vs 4.04% for IBID. At a 0.01 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XBJL charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for IBID.

Performance

XBJL vs. IBID - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - July (XBJL) and iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF (IBID). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XBJL achieves a 4.39% return, which is significantly higher than IBID's 1.99% return.

XBJL

• 1D: 0.05%
• 1M: 0.54%
• YTD: 4.39%
• 6M: 4.54%
• 1Y: 11.62%
• 3Y*: 11.49%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IBID

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -0.19%
• YTD: 1.99%
• 6M: 2.08%
• 1Y: 4.04%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XBJL vs. IBID - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
XBJL Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - July	4.39%	12.05%	11.50%	4.43%
IBID iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF	1.99%	5.66%	4.71%	2.61%

Correlation

The correlation between XBJL and IBID is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.08
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2023	0.01

Return for Risk

XBJL vs. IBID — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XBJL

XBJL Risk / Return Rank: 82
XBJL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
XBJL Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
XBJL Omega Ratio Rank: 87
XBJL Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
XBJL Martin Ratio Rank: 90

IBID

IBID Risk / Return Rank: 95
IBID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
IBID Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
IBID Omega Ratio Rank: 96
IBID Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
IBID Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XBJL vs. IBID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - July (XBJL) and iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF (IBID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XBJL	IBID	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.32	3.29	-0.97
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.56	5.55	-2.00
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.52	1.75	-0.23
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.53	8.22	-4.69
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	19.91	30.99	-11.08

XBJL vs. IBID - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XBJL Sharpe Ratio is 2.32, which is comparable to the IBID Sharpe Ratio of 3.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XBJL and IBID, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

XBJL vs. IBID - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XBJL drawdown since its inception was -11.78%, which is greater than IBID's maximum drawdown of -1.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XBJL and IBID.

Drawdown Indicators

	XBJL	IBID	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-11.78%	-1.28%	-10.50%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.30%	-0.49%	-2.81%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-11.74%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.49%	+0.49%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.62%	-0.22%	-1.40%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.58%	0.13%	+0.45%

Volatility

XBJL vs. IBID - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - July (XBJL) is 0.30%, while iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF (IBID) has a volatility of 0.35%. This indicates that XBJL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBID based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XBJL	IBID	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.30%	0.35%	-0.05%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.67%	0.86%	+2.81%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.05%	1.23%	+3.82%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.94%	2.24%	+7.70%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.94%	2.24%	+7.70%

XBJL vs. IBID - Expense Ratio Comparison

XBJL has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than IBID's 0.10% expense ratio.

Dividends

XBJL vs. IBID - Dividend Comparison

XBJL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IBID's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.68%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
IBID iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF	3.68%	4.43%	4.24%	0.81%
XBJL Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - July	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XBJL and IBID in my portfolio?

XBJL and IBID have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, XBJL or IBID?

IBID has higher volatility (0.35%) compared to XBJL (0.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XBJL dropped -11.78% vs IBID's -1.28%.

Which ETF is better, XBJL or IBID?

On 1-year performance, XBJL leads with 11.62% vs 4.04% for IBID. On fees, IBID is cheaper at 0.10% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, XBJL or IBID?

Over the 1-year period, XBJL has performed better with a 11.62% return vs 4.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, XBJL or IBID?

IBID is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for XBJL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XBJL or IBID?

IBID has the higher dividend yield at 3.68%, compared with 0.00% for XBJL.

What is the main difference between XBJL and IBID?

XBJL is categorized as Defined Outcome, while IBID is Inflation-Protected Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for XBJL and 0.10% for IBID.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IBID currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.29 vs 2.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.