XBJL vs. DMAX

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - July (XBJL) and iShares Large Cap Max Buffer December ETF (DMAX).

XBJL and DMAX are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XBJL is an actively managed fund by Innovator. It was launched on Jun 30, 2021. DMAX is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Index. It was launched on Dec 31, 2024.

Performance

XBJL vs. DMAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - July (XBJL) and iShares Large Cap Max Buffer December ETF (DMAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

XBJL vs. DMAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
XBJL Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - July	-0.27%	12.05%
DMAX iShares Large Cap Max Buffer December ETF	-0.26%	7.81%

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with XBJL having a -0.27% return and DMAX slightly higher at -0.26%.

XBJL

• 1D: 0.36%
• 1M: -1.12%
• YTD: -0.27%
• 6M: 1.80%
• 1Y: 12.33%
• 3Y*: 11.70%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DMAX

• 1D: 0.11%
• 1M: -0.73%
• YTD: -0.26%
• 6M: 1.70%
• 1Y: 7.74%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XBJL vs. DMAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

XBJL has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than DMAX's 0.50% expense ratio.

XBJL

Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - July

DMAX

iShares Large Cap Max Buffer December ETF

Return for Risk

XBJL vs. DMAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XBJL

XBJL Risk / Return Rank: 61
XBJL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
XBJL Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
XBJL Omega Ratio Rank: 78
XBJL Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
XBJL Martin Ratio Rank: 72

DMAX

DMAX Risk / Return Rank: 95
DMAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
DMAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
DMAX Omega Ratio Rank: 96
DMAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
DMAX Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XBJL vs. DMAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - July (XBJL) and iShares Large Cap Max Buffer December ETF (DMAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XBJL	DMAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.01	2.25	-1.24
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.55	3.38	-1.83
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.51	-0.20
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.31	3.94	-2.64
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	8.41	19.00	-10.59
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XBJL vs. DMAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XBJL Sharpe Ratio is 1.01, which is lower than the DMAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XBJL and DMAX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XBJL	DMAX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.01	2.25	-1.24
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.85	1.70	-0.85

Correlation

The correlation between XBJL and DMAX is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

XBJL vs. DMAX - Dividend Comparison

XBJL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DMAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.18%.

	TTM	2025
XBJL Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - July	0.00%	0.00%
DMAX iShares Large Cap Max Buffer December ETF	1.18%	1.18%

Drawdowns

XBJL vs. DMAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XBJL drawdown since its inception was -11.78%, which is greater than DMAX's maximum drawdown of -3.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XBJL and DMAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	XBJL	DMAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-11.78%	-3.37%	-8.41%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.77%	-2.00%	-7.77%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.31%	-0.86%	-0.45%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.69%	-0.42%	-1.27%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.52%	0.41%	+1.11%

Volatility

XBJL vs. DMAX - Volatility Comparison

Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - July (XBJL) has a higher volatility of 2.94% compared to iShares Large Cap Max Buffer December ETF (DMAX) at 0.99%. This indicates that XBJL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DMAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XBJL	DMAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.94%	0.99%	+1.95%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.07%	1.82%	+2.25%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.25%	3.45%	+8.80%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.15%	3.56%	+6.59%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.15%	3.56%	+6.59%