XBI vs. SPAQ
XBI (SPDR S&P Biotech ETF) and SPAQ (Horizon Kinetics SPAC Active ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds. XBI is passively managed, while SPAQ is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, XBI returned 15.65%/yr vs 5.86%/yr for SPAQ. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XBI charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for SPAQ.
Performance
XBI vs. SPAQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XBI achieves a 9.42% return, which is significantly higher than SPAQ's 2.82% return.
XBI
- 1D
- 2.77%
- 1M
- -0.28%
- YTD
- 9.42%
- 6M
- 8.61%
- 1Y
- 62.35%
- 3Y*
- 15.65%
- 5Y*
- 1.14%
- 10Y*
- 8.53%
SPAQ
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 1.67%
- YTD
- 2.82%
- 6M
- 1.66%
- 1Y
- 4.74%
- 3Y*
- 5.86%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XBI vs. SPAQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
XBI SPDR S&P Biotech ETF | 9.42% | 35.89% | 1.01% | 2.53% |
SPAQ Horizon Kinetics SPAC Active ETF | 2.82% | 7.35% | 4.33% | 5.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between XBI and SPAQ is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2023 | 0.07 |
XBI vs. SPAQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XBI
SPAQ
Healthcare
-
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Healthcare
XBI
SPAQ
-
Financial Services
XBI
SPAQ
Basic Materials
XBI
SPAQ
-
Communication Services
XBI
-
SPAQ
-
Consumer Cyclical
XBI
-
SPAQ
-
Consumer Defensive
XBI
-
SPAQ
-
Energy
XBI
-
SPAQ
-
Industrials
XBI
-
SPAQ
Real Estate
XBI
-
SPAQ
-
Technology
XBI
-
SPAQ
-
Utilities
XBI
-
SPAQ
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XBI vs. SPAQ — Risk / Return Rank
XBI
SPAQ
XBI vs. SPAQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Biotech ETF (XBI) and Horizon Kinetics SPAC Active ETF (SPAQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XBI | SPAQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.91 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.52 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.12 | +0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.45 | 0.90 | +5.55 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.53 | 3.23 | +16.31 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XBI | SPAQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.45 | 0.54 | +1.91 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.04 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.27 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.36 | 0.86 | -0.50 |
Drawdowns
XBI vs. SPAQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XBI drawdown since its inception was -63.89%, which is greater than SPAQ's maximum drawdown of -5.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XBI and SPAQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XBI | SPAQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.89% | -5.30% | -58.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.72% | -5.30% | -4.42% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.99% | -5.30% | -27.69% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -54.71% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -63.89% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.89% | 0.00% | -22.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.93% | -0.54% | -20.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.20% | 1.47% | +1.73% |
Volatility
XBI vs. SPAQ - Volatility Comparison
SPDR S&P Biotech ETF (XBI) has a higher volatility of 9.69% compared to Horizon Kinetics SPAC Active ETF (SPAQ) at 1.94%. This indicates that XBI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPAQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XBI | SPAQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.69% | 1.94% | +7.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.31% | 5.01% | +15.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.60% | 8.80% | +16.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.20% | 6.99% | +25.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.00% | 6.99% | +25.01% |
XBI vs. SPAQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
XBI has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than SPAQ's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
XBI vs. SPAQ - Dividend Comparison
XBI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%, less than SPAQ's 16.23% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPAQ Horizon Kinetics SPAC Active ETF | 16.23% | 16.69% | 3.00% | 2.60% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XBI SPDR S&P Biotech ETF | 0.33% | 0.37% | 0.15% | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.04% | 0.20% | 0.00% | 0.28% | 0.24% | 0.26% | 0.61% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XBI and SPAQ have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XBI has higher volatility (9.69%) compared to SPAQ (1.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XBI dropped -63.89% vs SPAQ's -5.30%.
On 3-year performance, XBI leads with 15.65% vs 5.86% for SPAQ. On fees, XBI is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, SPAQ has been the lower-risk option at 1.94%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, XBI has performed better with a 15.65% return vs 5.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XBI is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for SPAQ.
SPAQ has the higher dividend yield at 16.23%, compared with 0.33% for XBI.
They also come from different issuers: State Street and Horizon. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XBI and 0.85% for SPAQ.
XBI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.45 vs 0.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XBI and SPAQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer