PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XBI vs. NVDA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XBI vs. NVDA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Biotech ETF (XBI) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with XBI having a 9.73% return and NVDA slightly higher at 10.16%. Over the past 10 years, XBI has underperformed NVDA with an annualized return of 9.55%, while NVDA has yielded a comparatively higher 67.95% annualized return.


XBI

1D
0.79%
1M
-0.79%
YTD
9.73%
6M
9.02%
1Y
60.62%
3Y*
14.23%
5Y*
-0.20%
10Y*
9.55%

NVDA

1D
0.16%
1M
-8.83%
YTD
10.16%
6M
17.38%
1Y
44.72%
3Y*
71.13%
5Y*
63.13%
10Y*
67.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XBI vs. NVDA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XBI
SPDR S&P Biotech ETF
9.73%35.89%1.01%7.60%-25.87%-20.45%48.33%32.56%-15.28%43.77%
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
10.16%38.92%171.25%239.02%-50.26%125.48%122.30%76.94%-30.82%81.99%

Correlation

The correlation between XBI and NVDA is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.25

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 6, 2006

0.43

The correlation between XBI and NVDA shifts across timeframes, from 0.23 (1 year) to 0.43 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XBI vs. NVDA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XBI
XBI Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
XBI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XBI Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
XBI Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
XBI Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
XBI Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

NVDA
NVDA Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
NVDA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVDA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVDA Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
NVDA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVDA Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XBI vs. NVDA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Biotech ETF (XBI) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XBINVDADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.21

+0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.12

2.07

+4.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.07

4.94

+13.13

XBI vs. NVDA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XBI Sharpe Ratio is 2.28, which is higher than the NVDA Sharpe Ratio of 1.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XBI and NVDA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XBI vs. NVDA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XBI drawdown since its inception was -63.89%, smaller than the maximum NVDA drawdown of -89.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XBI and NVDA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XBINVDADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.89%

-89.72%

+25.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.72%

-20.21%

+10.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.99%

-36.88%

+3.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-54.71%

-66.34%

+11.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.89%

-66.34%

+2.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-22.67%

-12.86%

-9.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.93%

-36.18%

+15.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.30%

8.46%

-5.16%

Volatility

XBI vs. NVDA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR S&P Biotech ETF (XBI) is 10.39%, while NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) has a volatility of 13.26%. This indicates that XBI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NVDA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XBINVDADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.39%

13.26%

-2.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.76%

26.67%

-5.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.09%

35.00%

-8.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.21%

51.76%

-19.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.01%

49.84%

-17.83%

Dividends

XBI vs. NVDA - Dividend Comparison

XBI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%, more than NVDA's 0.14% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
0.14%0.02%0.03%0.03%0.11%0.05%0.12%0.27%0.46%0.29%0.45%1.20%
XBI
SPDR S&P Biotech ETF
0.33%0.37%0.15%0.02%0.00%0.04%0.20%0.00%0.28%0.24%0.26%0.61%

Frequently Asked Questions


XBI and NVDA have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NVDA has higher volatility (13.26%) compared to XBI (10.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XBI dropped -63.89% vs NVDA's -89.72%.

XBI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 1.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XBI and NVDA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer