XBI vs. MHIP
XBI (SPDR S&P Biotech ETF) and MHIP (Milliman Healthcare Inflation Plus ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds. XBI is passively managed, while MHIP is actively managed. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XBI charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for MHIP.
Performance
XBI vs. MHIP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
XBI
- 1D
- -2.70%
- 1M
- 12.42%
- 6M
- 22.36%
- YTD
- 24.78%
- 1Y
- 73.87%
- 3Y*
- 21.27%
- 5Y*
- 3.96%
- 10Y*
- 10.37%
MHIP
- 1D
- 0.60%
- 1M
- 0.71%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XBI vs. MHIP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
XBI SPDR S&P Biotech ETF | 10.42% |
MHIP Milliman Healthcare Inflation Plus ETF | 0.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between XBI and MHIP is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 21, 2026 | 0.52 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XBI vs. MHIP — Risk / Return Rank
XBI
MHIP
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
XBI vs. MHIP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Biotech ETF (XBI) and Milliman Healthcare Inflation Plus ETF (MHIP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XBI | MHIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.64 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 22.09 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XBI vs. MHIP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XBI drawdown since its inception was -63.89%, which is greater than MHIP's maximum drawdown of -3.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XBI and MHIP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XBI | MHIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.89% | -3.09% | -60.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.72% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.99% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -54.00% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -63.89% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.06% | -1.47% | -10.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.89% | -1.28% | -19.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.35% | — | — |
Volatility
XBI vs. MHIP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XBI | MHIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.50% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.51% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.65% | 11.54% | +15.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.33% | 11.54% | +20.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.93% | 11.54% | +20.39% |
XBI vs. MHIP - Expense Ratio Comparison
XBI has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than MHIP's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
XBI vs. MHIP - Dividend Comparison
XBI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%, while MHIP has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MHIP Milliman Healthcare Inflation Plus ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XBI SPDR S&P Biotech ETF | 0.38% | 0.37% | 0.15% | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.04% | 0.20% | 0.00% | 0.28% | 0.24% | 0.26% | 0.61% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XBI and MHIP have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XBI is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XBI is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for MHIP.
XBI has the higher dividend yield at 0.38%, compared with 0.00% for MHIP.
They also come from different issuers: State Street and Milliman. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XBI and 0.55% for MHIP.
Find the right allocation for XBI and MHIP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer