XBGG.L vs. XSTC.L
XBGG.L (Xtrackers II ESG Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF 3D GBP hedged) and XSTC.L (Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D) are both exchange-traded funds - XBGG.L is a Global Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR Hdg GBP, while XSTC.L is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XBGG.L returned -0.30%/yr vs 24.21%/yr for XSTC.L. At a correlation of -0.03, they often move in opposite directions. XBGG.L charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for XSTC.L.
Performance
XBGG.L vs. XSTC.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XBGG.L achieves a 0.16% return, which is significantly lower than XSTC.L's 23.32% return.
XBGG.L
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- 0.43%
- YTD
- 0.16%
- 6M
- 0.38%
- 1Y
- 3.11%
- 3Y*
- 3.48%
- 5Y*
- -0.30%
- 10Y*
- 0.78%
XSTC.L
- 1D
- -2.13%
- 1M
- 14.77%
- YTD
- 23.32%
- 6M
- 22.05%
- 1Y
- 53.36%
- 3Y*
- 30.65%
- 5Y*
- 24.21%
- 10Y*
- —
XBGG.L vs. XSTC.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XBGG.L Xtrackers II ESG Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF 3D GBP hedged | 0.16% | 4.60% | 2.19% | 5.74% | -13.34% | -1.53% | 4.26% | 6.68% | 0.96% |
XSTC.L Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D | 23.32% | 14.31% | 39.50% | 48.82% | -22.54% | 33.47% | 41.54% | 43.20% | 3.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between XBGG.L and XSTC.L is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 24, 2018 | -0.03 |
The correlation between XBGG.L and XSTC.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (all time) to 0.09 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XBGG.L vs. XSTC.L — Risk / Return Rank
XBGG.L
XSTC.L
XBGG.L vs. XSTC.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers II ESG Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF 3D GBP hedged (XBGG.L) and Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D (XSTC.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XBGG.L | XSTC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.76 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.44 | -0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.15 | 3.04 | -1.89 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.33 | 7.79 | -4.46 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XBGG.L | XSTC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 | 2.70 | -1.76 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.07 | 1.09 | -1.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.19 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.21 | 1.14 | -0.92 |
Drawdowns
XBGG.L vs. XSTC.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XBGG.L drawdown since its inception was -17.06%, smaller than the maximum XSTC.L drawdown of -29.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XBGG.L and XSTC.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XBGG.L | XSTC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.06% | -29.30% | +12.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.70% | -17.49% | +14.79% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.91% | -29.30% | +25.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.89% | -29.30% | +12.41% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -17.06% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.55% | -2.71% | -0.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.80% | -6.30% | +1.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.93% | 6.83% | -5.90% |
Volatility
XBGG.L vs. XSTC.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers II ESG Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF 3D GBP hedged (XBGG.L) is 1.46%, while Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D (XSTC.L) has a volatility of 7.05%. This indicates that XBGG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XSTC.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XBGG.L | XSTC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.46% | 7.05% | -5.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.64% | 14.45% | -11.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.29% | 19.63% | -16.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.52% | 22.22% | -17.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.05% | 22.43% | -18.38% |
XBGG.L vs. XSTC.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XBGG.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than XSTC.L's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XBGG.L vs. XSTC.L - Dividend Comparison
XBGG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.96%, more than XSTC.L's 0.26% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XBGG.L Xtrackers II ESG Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF 3D GBP hedged | 2.96% | 2.93% | 3.04% | 2.00% | 2.76% | 0.79% | 1.35% | 1.72% | 1.42% |
XSTC.L Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D | 0.26% | 0.33% | 0.37% | 0.53% | 1.08% | 0.53% | 0.63% | 0.60% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XBGG.L and XSTC.L have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XSTC.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XSTC.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for XBGG.L.
XBGG.L is categorized as Global Bonds, while XSTC.L is Technology Equities. XBGG.L tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR Hdg GBP, while XSTC.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for XBGG.L and 0.12% for XSTC.L.
Find the right allocation for XBGG.L and XSTC.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer