XBB vs. BBHY
XBB (BondBloxx BB Rated USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF) and BBHY (JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF) are both High Yield Bonds funds - XBB tracks the ICE BofA BB US Cash Pay High Yield Constrained Index while BBHY tracks the ICE BofA US High Yield Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, XBB returned 7.84%/yr vs 8.76%/yr for BBHY. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XBB charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for BBHY.
Performance
XBB vs. BBHY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XBB achieves a 1.53% return, which is significantly lower than BBHY's 1.73% return.
XBB
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- 0.46%
- YTD
- 1.53%
- 6M
- 1.76%
- 1Y
- 6.37%
- 3Y*
- 7.84%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BBHY
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- 0.49%
- YTD
- 1.73%
- 6M
- 2.18%
- 1Y
- 7.10%
- 3Y*
- 8.76%
- 5Y*
- 4.12%
- 10Y*
- —
XBB vs. BBHY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XBB BondBloxx BB Rated USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 1.53% | 8.59% | 6.41% | 10.63% | -3.77% |
BBHY JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 1.73% | 8.51% | 7.81% | 11.98% | -3.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between XBB and BBHY is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 27, 2022 | 0.88 |
The correlation between XBB and BBHY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
XBB vs. BBHY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XBB
BBHY
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Communication Services
Healthcare
Energy
Financial Services
Technology
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
XBB
BBHY
Industrials
XBB
BBHY
Communication Services
XBB
BBHY
Healthcare
XBB
BBHY
Energy
XBB
BBHY
Financial Services
XBB
BBHY
Technology
XBB
BBHY
Real Estate
XBB
BBHY
Basic Materials
XBB
BBHY
Utilities
XBB
BBHY
Consumer Defensive
XBB
BBHY
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XBB vs. BBHY — Risk / Return Rank
XBB
BBHY
XBB vs. BBHY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BondBloxx BB Rated USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (XBB) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BBHY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XBB | BBHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.58 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.39 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.28 | 3.00 | -0.72 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.49 | 13.50 | -4.02 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XBB | BBHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.64 | 1.97 | -0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.57 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.81 | 0.64 | +0.16 |
Drawdowns
XBB vs. BBHY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XBB drawdown since its inception was -8.87%, smaller than the maximum BBHY drawdown of -24.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XBB and BBHY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XBB | BBHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.87% | -24.98% | +16.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.80% | -2.37% | -0.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.86% | -5.00% | +1.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -15.32% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.20% | -0.14% | -0.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.33% | -2.37% | +1.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.67% | 0.53% | +0.14% |
Volatility
XBB vs. BBHY - Volatility Comparison
BondBloxx BB Rated USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (XBB) has a higher volatility of 1.25% compared to JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BBHY) at 1.13%. This indicates that XBB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BBHY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XBB | BBHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.25% | 1.13% | +0.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.81% | 2.85% | -0.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.92% | 3.62% | +0.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.08% | 7.26% | -0.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.08% | 7.53% | -0.45% |
XBB vs. BBHY - Expense Ratio Comparison
XBB has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than BBHY's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XBB vs. BBHY - Dividend Comparison
XBB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.55%, less than BBHY's 6.94% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBHY JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 6.94% | 7.24% | 7.18% | 6.49% | 5.92% | 4.06% | 4.73% | 4.99% | 5.02% | 4.81% | 1.42% |
XBB BondBloxx BB Rated USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 5.55% | 5.42% | 6.35% | 6.15% | 3.73% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XBB and BBHY have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XBB has higher volatility (1.25%) compared to BBHY (1.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XBB dropped -8.87% vs BBHY's -24.98%.
On 3-year performance, BBHY leads with 8.76% vs 7.84% for XBB. On fees, BBHY is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, BBHY has been the lower-risk option at 1.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, BBHY has performed better with a 8.76% return vs 7.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BBHY is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for XBB.
BBHY has the higher dividend yield at 6.94%, compared with 5.55% for XBB.
XBB tracks ICE BofA BB US Cash Pay High Yield Constrained Index, while BBHY tracks ICE BofA US High Yield Index. They also come from different issuers: BondBloxx and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for XBB and 0.15% for BBHY.
BBHY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs 1.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XBB and BBHY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer