XBAP vs. XBJL

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

XBAP (Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - April) and XBJL (Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - July) are both Defined Outcome funds from Innovator. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, XBAP returned 13.83%/yr vs 11.71%/yr for XBJL. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.79% expense ratio.

Performance

XBAP vs. XBJL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - April (XBAP) and Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - July (XBJL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XBAP achieves a 8.24% return, which is significantly higher than XBJL's 4.16% return.

XBAP

• 1D: 0.01%
• 1M: 1.65%
• YTD: 8.24%
• 6M: 9.31%
• 1Y: 15.97%
• 3Y*: 13.83%
• 5Y*: 9.91%
• 10Y*: —

XBJL

• 1D: 0.01%
• 1M: 0.98%
• YTD: 4.16%
• 6M: 5.25%
• 1Y: 12.56%
• 3Y*: 11.71%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XBAP vs. XBJL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
XBAP Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - April	8.24%	13.38%	11.55%	20.53%	-7.59%	3.31%
XBJL Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - July	4.16%	12.05%	11.50%	19.49%	-4.98%	4.70%

Correlation

The correlation between XBAP and XBJL is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.72
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.79
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2021	0.88

The correlation between XBAP and XBJL shifts across timeframes, from 0.72 (1 year) to 0.88 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XBAP vs. XBJL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XBAP	XBJL
Technology	35.7%	36.2%
Financial Services	11.6%	11.9%
Communication Services	11.3%	10.9%
Consumer Cyclical	10.2%	10.1%
Healthcare	8.5%	8.4%
Industrials	8.3%	8.1%
Consumer Defensive	4.9%	4.9%
Energy	3.5%	3.5%
Utilities	2.4%	2.3%
Real Estate	1.9%	1.9%
Basic Materials	1.8%	1.8%

Return for Risk

XBAP vs. XBJL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XBAP

XBAP Risk / Return Rank: 98
XBAP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
XBAP Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
XBAP Omega Ratio Rank: 98
XBAP Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
XBAP Martin Ratio Rank: 98

XBJL

XBJL Risk / Return Rank: 82
XBJL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
XBJL Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
XBJL Omega Ratio Rank: 87
XBJL Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
XBJL Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XBAP vs. XBJL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - April (XBAP) and Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - July (XBJL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XBAP	XBJL	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	4.64	2.48	+2.15
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	9.02	3.82	+5.20
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	2.25	1.55	+0.70
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	16.82	3.87	+12.95
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	86.13	21.85	+64.28
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XBAP vs. XBJL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XBAP Sharpe Ratio is 4.64, which is higher than the XBJL Sharpe Ratio of 2.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XBAP and XBJL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XBAP	XBJL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.64	2.48	+2.15
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.00	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.02	0.93	+0.09

Drawdowns

XBAP vs. XBJL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XBAP drawdown since its inception was -14.57%, which is greater than XBJL's maximum drawdown of -11.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XBAP and XBJL.

Drawdown Indicators

	XBAP	XBJL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.57%	-11.78%	-2.79%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.98%	-3.30%	+2.32%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-8.25%	-11.74%	+3.49%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-14.57%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.75%	-1.63%	-0.12%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.19%	0.58%	-0.39%

Volatility

XBAP vs. XBJL - Volatility Comparison

Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - April (XBAP) has a higher volatility of 0.70% compared to Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - July (XBJL) at 0.32%. This indicates that XBAP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XBJL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XBAP	XBJL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.70%	0.32%	+0.38%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.52%	3.73%	-1.21%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.48%	5.08%	-1.60%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.96%	9.99%	-0.03%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.87%	9.99%	-0.12%

XBAP vs. XBJL - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both XBAP and XBJL have an expense ratio of 0.79%.

Dividends

XBAP vs. XBJL - Dividend Comparison

Neither XBAP nor XBJL has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XBAP and XBJL in my portfolio?

XBAP and XBJL have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, XBAP or XBJL?

XBAP has higher volatility (0.70%) compared to XBJL (0.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XBAP dropped -14.57% vs XBJL's -11.78%.

Which ETF is better, XBAP or XBJL?

On 3-year performance, XBAP leads with 13.83% vs 11.71% for XBJL. Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. On volatility, XBJL has been the lower-risk option at 0.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, XBAP or XBJL?

Over the 3-year period, XBAP has performed better with a 13.83% return vs 11.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, XBAP or XBJL?

XBAP and XBJL have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XBAP or XBJL?

XBAP and XBJL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XBAP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.64 vs 2.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.