XBAP vs. LOUP

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

XBAP (Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - April) and LOUP (Innovator Deepwater Frontier Tech ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XBAP is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by Innovator, while LOUP is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Deepwater Frontier Tech Index. XBAP is actively managed, while LOUP is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XBAP returned 9.73%/yr vs 11.10%/yr for LOUP. Their 0.73 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. XBAP charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for LOUP.

Performance

XBAP vs. LOUP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - April (XBAP) and Innovator Deepwater Frontier Tech ETF (LOUP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XBAP achieves a 9.61% return, which is significantly lower than LOUP's 15.52% return.

XBAP

• 1D: 0.30%
• 1M: 1.02%
• 6M: 8.93%
• YTD: 9.61%
• 1Y: 14.68%
• 3Y*: 13.42%
• 5Y*: 9.73%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 9.99%

LOUP

• 1D: 3.71%
• 1M: -8.11%
• 6M: 13.75%
• YTD: 15.52%
• 1Y: 42.21%
• 3Y*: 30.80%
• 5Y*: 11.10%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 17.01%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
LOUP Innovator Deepwater Frontier Tech ETF	$955.20K	$911.36K	$1.36M
XBAP Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - April	$187.97K	$204.73K	$257.42K

XBAP vs. LOUP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
XBAP Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - April	9.61%	13.38%	11.55%	20.53%	-7.59%	7.65%
LOUP Innovator Deepwater Frontier Tech ETF	15.52%	43.24%	21.80%	51.31%	-46.00%	-0.89%

Correlation

The correlation between XBAP and LOUP is 0.65, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.65
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.68
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.74
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2021	0.73

The correlation between XBAP and LOUP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

XBAP vs. LOUP - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XBAP	LOUP
Technology	39.1%	57.5%
Financial Services	10.9%	3.6%
Communication Services	10.7%	3.0%
Consumer Cyclical	9.9%	10.2%
Healthcare	8.3%	2.8%
Industrials	7.8%	16.0%
Consumer Defensive	4.5%	-
Energy	3.1%	3.2%
Utilities	2.1%	3.6%
Real Estate	1.8%	-
Basic Materials	1.7%	-

Return for Risk

XBAP vs. LOUP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

XBAP

XBAP Risk / Return Rank: 98
XBAP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
XBAP Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
XBAP Omega Ratio Rank: 98
XBAP Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
XBAP Martin Ratio Rank: 98

LOUP

LOUP Risk / Return Rank: 51
LOUP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
LOUP Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
LOUP Omega Ratio Rank: 47
LOUP Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
LOUP Martin Ratio Rank: 50

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

XBAP vs. LOUP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - April (XBAP) and Innovator Deepwater Frontier Tech ETF (LOUP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XBAP	LOUP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	4.04	1.36	+2.68
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	7.15	1.89	+5.26
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	2.02	1.23	+0.79
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	11.38	2.02	+9.36
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	59.28	5.94	+53.34

XBAP vs. LOUP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XBAP Sharpe Ratio is 4.04, which is higher than the LOUP Sharpe Ratio of 1.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XBAP and LOUP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

XBAP vs. LOUP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XBAP drawdown since its inception was -14.57%, smaller than the maximum LOUP drawdown of -58.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XBAP and LOUP.

Drawdown Indicators

	XBAP	LOUP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.57%	-58.68%	+44.11%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.30%	-21.00%	+19.70%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-8.25%	-35.23%	+26.98%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-14.57%	-55.63%	+41.06%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-11.58%	+11.58%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.70%	-19.79%	+18.09%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.25%	7.13%	-6.88%

Volatility

XBAP vs. LOUP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - April (XBAP) is 1.18%, while Innovator Deepwater Frontier Tech ETF (LOUP) has a volatility of 10.13%. This indicates that XBAP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LOUP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XBAP	LOUP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.18%	10.13%	-8.95%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.11%	25.01%	-21.90%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.66%	31.25%	-27.59%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.97%	32.89%	-22.92%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.75%	32.08%	-22.33%

XBAP vs. LOUP - Expense Ratio Comparison

XBAP has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than LOUP's 0.70% expense ratio.

Dividends

XBAP vs. LOUP - Dividend Comparison

Neither XBAP nor LOUP has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XBAP and LOUP in my portfolio?

XBAP and LOUP have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, XBAP or LOUP?

LOUP has higher volatility (10.13%) compared to XBAP (1.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XBAP dropped -14.57% vs LOUP's -58.68%.

Which ETF is better, XBAP or LOUP?

On 5-year performance, LOUP leads with 11.10% vs 9.73% for XBAP. On fees, LOUP is cheaper at 0.70% per year. On volatility, XBAP has been the lower-risk option at 1.18%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, XBAP or LOUP?

Over the 5-year period, LOUP has performed better with a 11.10% return vs 9.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, XBAP or LOUP?

LOUP is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for XBAP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XBAP or LOUP?

XBAP and LOUP have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between XBAP and LOUP?

XBAP is categorized as Defined Outcome, while LOUP is Technology Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for XBAP and 0.70% for LOUP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XBAP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.04 vs 1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.